Thread: The results are in

Thanks GSP Follower, I have sent several requests for this exact information, when did the council inform Election NZ and the national office and what was their response's, did they know of the underhanded, backdoor politics used to get it through.
Its plain as day that they have completely Fk'd this up, but who else higher up gave them the ok to carry on, how far up the chain does this go. All this info is being passed over to the media.
This should serve notice to all the other councils around the country to make sure they do things by the book because the licence holders are watching

Originally Posted by HB Hunting

Thanks GSP Follower, I have sent several requests for this exact information, when did the council inform Election NZ and the national office and what was their response's, did they know of the underhanded, backdoor politics used to get it through.
Its plain as day that they have completely Fk'd this up, but who else higher up gave them the ok to carry on, how far up the chain does this go. All this info is being passed over to the media.
This should serve notice to all the other councils around the country to make sure they do things by the book because the licence holders are watching

good luck hb hunter i got 3 different stories from elections nz before i got what i hope is the truth but could just be the latest version of said truth.

Yes there seems to be a lot of that going around, and people are looking to cover their own rear ends, so as not to be exposed by the actions of this council.
But as they say "the truth will win out in the end"
If you go to only one meeting this needs to be the one that people need to attend and bring this council to task, these people have forgotten what they are there for.

when did the council inform Election NZ and the national office

the councill didnt the manager did at least that the evidence i have.
who authorised him or gave him that impression god knows again no paper trail..
but as to if its being played for the benefit of several parties with multiple scapegoats each thinking the other is the patsy that could be the 64,000 $ question.

"the truth will win out in the end"

hopefuly but i suspect what could be a even more costly gag order employment agreement might stymie that.
its hard to see thier endgame but believe me its there.
but you guys taking back your region would stuff all the games.
getting eastern councill well away from the region would be one of my 2nd moves.
you will find a substancial cost hAS BEEN INCURRED before you even get the truth.

ALL THE BEST TO YOU ALL.

At the April meeting we again discussed it and voted unanimously to move to 8 councillors for the 2015 elections, but it wasn’t included in that meeting’s agenda. The Manager was instructed to include it as an agenda’d item in the next meeting in June.

so important and forward thinking and licence buyer friendly it wasnt even in the minutes niether was any mention of consultation which i doubt was given a 2nd thought
why is that the only proposal or vote not in the minutes something that ground breaking would at least be recorded as proposed seconded but a unanimous vote not even recorded.??
yet again not even recorded in the summary of resolutions this groundbreaking nzc inspired bit of public minded cost saving licencee minded altruism in action??
pull the other one it plays dixie.
why would it need to be on the june agenda what were you gonna do vote on it twice ????
i could understand it if you were gonna take time to consult your licence buyers but no you ''voted unanimously''tui,s anyone