Thread: Submission regarding fish and game

I’ve been following a lot of the upland conservation organisations in the states for a while, cutting edge stuff, New Zealand has the potential to model itself in the same way I believe, where countries like Australia have too much red tape and not enough support, so at least there is a solid backbone to start with. Keep them seperate is vital (F&G + DOC). Funding is crucial, I think adopting a Pitman Robertson tax/act, where all the money raised outside licenses etc from the tax pays for public lands and habitat management, this could aid in keeping the cogs turning in a progressive manner. 90% or more of what’s good for game birds and fish benefits the native flora and fauna too, if we can agree on 90% between both parties I’m sure there’s a solid future for all.

Originally Posted by Shot Bro

I’ve been following a lot of the upland conservation organisations in the states for a while, cutting edge stuff, New Zealand has the potential to model itself in the same way I believe, where countries like Australia have too much red tape and not enough support, so at least there is a solid backbone to start with. Keep them seperate is vital (F&G + DOC). Funding is crucial, I think adopting a Pitman Robertson tax/act, where all the money raised outside licenses etc from the tax pays for public lands and habitat management, this could aid in keeping the cogs turning in a progressive manner. 90% or more of what’s good for game birds and fish benefits the native flora and fauna too, if we can agree on 90% between both parties I’m sure there’s a solid future for all.

f&g,s independence is vital that doest mean the government cant contribute when they do the governments job for them