I can't seem to find any information on it in tea, but I do find information on how fluroacetate in plants was problematic in livestock in Australia because it kept killing of significant amounts of herds. I highly doubt humans could really consume the same plants if it's killing off livestock.
Which regardless would still make their claims redundant because people are not putting 1080 compound in their tea.
Which they are insinuating.
And having tea with fluroacetate plant in it would have to be rather diluted with a lot of water.
Overall I guess my point is that they are very, very misleading with their statements.
Bookmarks