Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Night Vision NZ Terminator


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By veitnamcam

Thread: Commercial response to todays changes in SNA1

  1. #1
    Member hunter308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,086

    Commercial response to todays changes in SNA1

    THey are starting to call foul already.


    Recreational Bias in Minister’s Decision Snapper Fishery East Coast North Island

    This is a shared fishery where recreational, commercial and customary interests fish side by side. We need decisions that create incentives for us to work together to manage the fishery.

    We have all taken cuts when needed – and we all need to experience (allocation) gains in the good times.

    The good times are here – the fishery is healthier than it has been for 20 years and growing despite the unrestrained growth in the recreational and charter boat sector.

    But now the rebuild plan is showing success, the increased catch allocation is given to only one sector – recreational fishers.

    It is of concern to us that despite the recreational allowance being exceeded by 52% there has been no allowance for increased commercial catch, even a small catch increase to start to offset the additional costs in the Minister’s decision.

    Despite commercial allocations being cut in the past, commercial fishers have kept within their catch limits.

    It is unfair to penalise commercial fishers and sends a poor message to the commercial sector – look after the fishery but ultimately you will lose it. That drives a deep wedge into the heart of the conservation ethic out on the water.

    The most basic foundation of our fisheries management system is that fishers in all sectors need to take a long term view. A restrained catch today gives everyone a greater catch tomorrow. This no longer seems to ring true.

    There is a huge population of Aucklanders who rely on commercial fishers to make their fish available in fish shops, supermarkets and restaurants. How would Auckland continue to rank as one of the top 10 cities to live in the world if you can’t buy snapper locally or at a restaurant?

    Eric Barratt
    Managing Director
    RULE 4: IDENTIFY YOUR TARGET BEYOND ALL DOUBT


    To be a Human is to be an Alien, ask the animals, We invade this world and we are killing it, we are destroying the earth and nobody gives a fuck except for the animals
    .

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,517
    Thats the best quote of bullshit I've heard for ages, the guy is obviously out of touch with reality.
    I also have to wonder what he has been smoking .
    Gun control means using both hands

  3. #3
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,968
    Should we just tack on a 30 percent quota tax for discard to make it fair...

    Ducking for cover.:eek:

    Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
    Chris likes this.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,517
    Quote Originally Posted by veitnamcam View Post
    Should we just tack on a 30 percent quota tax for discard to make it fair...

    Ducking for cover.:eek:

    Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
    maybe a increase in the commercial sectors GST to say 25% as well as the above .
    A reduction of quota by a similar percentage is also in order to speed the regeneration of the inshore fishery.

    Shud-up Chris ffs this is verging on political again
    Gun control means using both hands

  5. #5
    Sending it Gibo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The Hill
    Posts
    23,476
    Nah all they need to do is include by catch in their quota so that they learn to catch what the heck they are trying to instead of dumping it!
    Thats whats fucking it up IMO and MO is worth sweet FA of course!!

  6. #6
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,968
    The qms makes it very difficult in some areas to actually catch your quota of a species you or the company you are working for payed good money for.

    The whole qms system needs a revamp- it was ground breaking management when introduced and since then it has been upgraded none.
    The commodor 64 was ground breaking in around the same era and Bill Gates was quoted as saying 64 meg or kb or what ever the Hell it is is more than the home user will ever need!

    Times change.

    Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  7. #7
    Gone but not forgotten Gapped axe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Lake Tarawera
    Posts
    4,044
    Make selling snapper overseas illegal, no probl's then with Auckland issues.
    "ars longa, vita brevis"

  8. #8
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,968
    A country like nz could be almost totaly self sufficient.
    Why do we have to prostitute ourselves on the global market?
    Because that's how a handful of people get filthy Fuckin Ritch.

    Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  9. #9
    Sending it Gibo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The Hill
    Posts
    23,476
    It also creates jobs for us to earn money to live

  10. #10
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,968
    How come almost everyone had a good paying job and higher standard of living before we had to say global prices for staples?

    In the 70s it was the norm to raise a family and pay a mortgage on one average wage comfortably.
    Try that now.

    Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  11. #11
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,968
    Imho it should be illeagle to export a whole log or fish and for any non citizen to catch that fish or process that fish or log.

    Do that very low unemployment very low local prices high standard of living. Oh yea that's how it used to be.:rolleyes:

    Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  12. #12
    Member hunter308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,086
    Sadly cam those days are gone hell I remember mum and dad spending $100 a week or maybe less to feed them and us two kids. and damn near every weekend it was off over the sand dunes from where we lived on simpson road in papamoa fishing and grabbing a feed of tua tua and getting a good bucket load of whitebait out of the kaituna cut during whitebait season. But now our poplation is exploding jobs are getting harder to get as there is normally 8-900 other people applying for the same job, employers would rather not train someone to do a job but hire skilled staff from overseas hence the increase in population, therefore increasing the unemployment rate. If our population was to shrink back down to what it was back in the 70's and 80's I do not know what it would do to our country or the economy would be hard to say if it would improve it all or send the country to total bankruptcy. What needs to be sorted out is the banning of bottom trawlers from trawling close to the shoreline and boot them 10k's offshore and go longlines only for commercial snapper fishing close to the shoreline then there would not be any need to cause a big fish wastage through dumping and the whole process can be more selective and a better chance to put those undersized or small ones back alive. But will we be listened to hell no they care more about making money than conserving the underwater environment by preventing damage to it.
    RULE 4: IDENTIFY YOUR TARGET BEYOND ALL DOUBT


    To be a Human is to be an Alien, ask the animals, We invade this world and we are killing it, we are destroying the earth and nobody gives a fuck except for the animals
    .

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Possible changes to snapper limits for Area SNA1
    By hunter308 in forum Fishing
    Replies: 155
    Last Post: 18-09-2013, 08:00 AM
  2. Todays invention
    By Twoshotkill in forum Gear and Equipment
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 26-08-2013, 09:41 PM
  3. Response to Vizsla thread on the other forum
    By Pointer in forum Hunting Dogs
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 18-06-2013, 01:37 PM
  4. Todays Effort!
    By Splash in forum Fishing
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 27-07-2012, 10:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!