Thread: Thoughts on this?

Hmmm he will be making a bit of money of you tube which will have videos of him using the boat... Use that argument and every guide that puts up videos on doc land should need a concession, starts a slippery slope.

Very odd they won't send the legislation, I'd say it's a retaliation to what he has said about commercial fishing (haven't seen that video). If that's the case it shouldn't hold up in court.

Originally Posted by 223nut

Hmmm he will be making a bit of money of you tube which will have videos of him using the boat... Use that argument and every guide that puts up videos on doc land should need a concession, starts a slippery slope.

Very odd they won't send the legislation, I'd say it's a retaliation to what he has said about commercial fishing (haven't seen that video). If that's the case it shouldn't hold up in court.

Every guide already does need a concession don't they? As does every drone operator I think...

Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Wildman

Every guide already does need a concession don't they? As does every drone operator I think...

Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk

They do if guiding on doc land, if they are just showing a video of deer on doc land not whilst guiding... Was used as an example (probably not the best one)