Thread: An accuracy challenge

I have got too old to care about tiny groups. Practical accuracy and consistency is where its at for me now. I spend more time ensuring my technique is where it should be than what my rifles can do. Fundamentals are the basis for all types of shooting and if you have them to a high standard, mistakes are less likely.
If I roll my ammo correctly I know my hunting rifles can shoot better than I can, so thats all that interests me these days.

I did get all excited when I first shot my Sig P320 9mm at 25, freestyle, not off a ransom rest.(With a dot) I put 10 rnds into 1.5 inches with 2 separate clusters. I have yet to replicate that even now that I am more familiar with the gun. Therefore a definite fluke. But its safe to say my pistol is now, a 6 MOA gun

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by R93

I have got too old to care about tiny groups. Practical accuracy and consistency is where its at for me now. I spend more time ensuring my technique is where it should be than what my rifles can do. Fundamentals are the basis for all types of shooting and if you have them to a high standard, mistakes are less likely.
If I roll my ammo correctly I know my hunting rifles can shoot better than I can, so thats all that interests me these days.

I did get all excited when I first shot my Sig P320 9mm at 25, freestyle, not off a ransom rest.(With a dot) I put 10 rnds into 1.5 inches with 2 separate clusters. I have yet to replicate that even now that I am more familiar with the gun. Therefore a definite fluke. But its safe to say my pistol is now, a 6 MOA gun

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

Thats true. Sometimes i get bughole groups but the position on the target isn't where i know the wind should have put it. Meaning i replicated a shitty shooting position a few times...
A good repeatable technique seems to require constant practice to maintain eh