Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Gunworks


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 30
Like Tree11Likes

Thread: Assessing resulting vertical spread from ES (or SD) for your load at distance

Threaded View

  1. #2
    Member Puffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    1,036
    ….. a worked example:

    Let’s say a bullet is being used with an average muzzle velocity of 2800 ft/sec. The ES of the load in that particular rifle is known to be ± 10 ft/sec, and the interest is in the maximum amount of vertical spread this could end up producing on a target at 1 kilometre.

    The Applied Ballistics or JBM balllistcs calculator is set up with all the necessary inputs (including the usual zero distance of say 200m) and the drop is found for a 2800 ft/sec muzzle velocity. Lets say it is exactly 10 metres. Then the MV is changed to 2790 ft/sec (and 2810ft/sec, just to confirm), and new POIs at those settings are calculated and found to be say 70mm above and below the nominal. The ES is expected then to produce a 140mm spread on the target.

    In fact the true dispersion from that size of ES is likely to be around ±85mm as follows: The calculations are repeated, except this time the zero distance is moved back in the simulation to as close to the muzzle as possible (ideally at the muzzle, but 1 metre may be the closest that can be entered). Because of the short zero it is necessary to also reduce the sight height to zero so the rifle doesn’t end up being tipped at a steep angle in the simulation. This then simulates a barrel held perfectly horizontally and where the bullet drops away below this line. More importantly with these settings the barrel remains in exactly the same position for both the 2800 ft/sec and the 2790 ft/sec and 2810 ft/sec calculations, giving a ±85mm difference in POI..
    In the first example where the zero was 200m this is not the case: the barrel is simulated to launch the bullets at very slightly different angles for each of the three muzzle velocities, having the effect to partially compensating for the difference in MV.

    The error using these ballistics programs to find vertical spread from ES becomes more pronounced the further out the zero distance used. Take an extreme example where the zero entered into the ballistics program is right out at the target at 1 km. The simulation will clearly calculate no change in the POI for any variations in muzzle velocity !

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Adding to the spread
    By Rock river arms hunter in forum Game Bird Hunting
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24-03-2017, 01:27 PM
  2. Vertical Stringing
    By gqhoon in forum Shooting
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 29-10-2016, 10:57 PM
  3. Extreme spread
    By R93 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-07-2012, 07:46 PM
  4. Getting movment into your pond decoy spread
    By Baz in forum Game Bird Hunting
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-04-2012, 11:33 PM
  5. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 25-12-2011, 12:48 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!