Thread: Buggar... scoped moved

Originally Posted by rugerman

First question, has the scope moved ? or are you just considering it as a possibility. If it has moved then re tighten and have another go.

Scope 100% moved. Saw the original mount marks, and after the 50 the scope was at least 20mm difference.

Originally Posted by Larskramer

Scope 100% moved. Saw the original mount marks, and after the 50 the scope was at least 20mm difference.

PITA for sure - though to be thorough and sure - I'd start over with the seating testing... cant be left 2nd guessing then, and you can then graph your results and this will indicate where ya nodes lie - 1 vs 2 tight groups etc... then helps lock in a seating depth that allows for wear...

Originally Posted by Nasty Factory Trigger

PITA for sure - though to be thorough and sure - I'd start over with the seating testing... cant be left 2nd guessing then, and you can then graph your results and this will indicate where ya nodes lie - 1 vs 2 tight groups etc... then helps lock in a seating depth that allows for wear...

Attachment 204428

NFT, that's a tour de force.
Looks like a 6mm PPC ?

I don't like the idea of fitting a single curvy line that runs exactly through all the points on your graph. A regression curve that allows for some uncertainty of measurement in each groups size would be more convincing. You can get some idea of that from the way your 3 group average varies by up to 0.2" from the single measurement on the left. Looks like around CBTO 1.915 should be your sweet spot. Nevertheless, very good work and I wish I had data like that.

Originally Posted by Bagheera

NFT, that's a tour de force.
Looks like a 6mm PPC ?

I don't like the idea of fitting a single curvy line that runs exactly through all the points on your graph. A regression curve that allows for some uncertainty of measurement in each groups size would be more convincing. You can get some idea of that from the way your 3 group average varies by up to 0.2" from the single measurement on the left. Looks like around CBTO 1.915 should be your sweet spot. Nevertheless, very good work and I wish I had data like that.

223 Rem for 60 gr Vmax

The graph was plotted using Excel - using exact figures. I hear you though not keen on use of a regression curve - we OCD over collection of such results, change seating depths at three thousandths of an inch at a time - there's no way I'm going to use a regression curve to draw a 'best fit' - its either doing something or not - thats my view that may differ from others.
However I'm more OCD on these sort of things! Can be a hinderance in some aspects !

Thanks though.... you too can attain data like this...
You're in my neck of woods - never say never