It’s actually much like this forum environment.Whenever I went to the shooters for their opinion to take back to the NRA we would all end up talking in circles? It was hellishly frustrating. I remember well at the end of the F-Class Nationals drawing equal with ??? (I was going to say Kevin but that was a Ballenger) There was no official ruling as to how to work out the winner. As the delegate at the time I wanted to put in place an agreement as how we would sort it out. All I got was 20 odd guys looking at their feet. In the end Graeme made the call on count back. Anyway a few weeks later I get rumors of bitching. As far as I was concerned they had there opportunity and missed it. Back then a number of shooters wanted their own target and I was for that as well. I wanted to avoid any more draws. But there was no way in hell we were going to get that. The move to the targets you have now I assume is for the better?
Gimp as I see it the real advantage of a practical match is that there is no real fixed infrastructure. NRA shooting will most likely disappear with time. If regions cannot acquire the land or the infrastructure to shoot they fail as has happened here in Taranaki. As the regions dry up this has a flow on effect in Trentham. I see the club fees are $265.00?? Or some rather large number like that. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to work out what is happening there. That fee will drive even more away and so on.
Your practical matches are a better model and more sustainable. The only down side I see is that I assume a great deal of the setup cost and energy to keep it going most likely sits with just 1 or maybe a very small number of guys. With that in mind the matches are dependent on their interest in keeping it going. Anybody who shoots at these matches would be wise to pass on their appreciation to those individuals and where possible make every effort to help.
Bookmarks