Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Darkness


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
Like Tree11Likes

Thread: Its about how you hold your mouth...

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,377

    Its about how you hold your mouth...

    Here’s an 8 shot group from today. A mix of new and old cases, and 180BT and 180AB Noslers, 300winmag. Remington, bedded but standard stock.

    The rifle was held in the free recoil sort of hold. My left hand just tucked around by the butt, but not touching. Forend sitting on a bag, rear bag just behind the pistol grip. 100 yards.



    Then, I maintained the same bag set up, but placed my left hand on the objective bell of the scope and applied a little downwards pressure to firm the rifle into the front bag. I sometimes do this. The 2 shots I fired from this hold were 1” higher and 1.5” to the right of the previous group.

    What I’m wondering is, if the rifle had a stiffer stock would it be this sensitive to how its held, or is it something that all rifles do (but I have never taken any notice previously)?

    Incidentally, I’ve been shooting shit groups for 50 years
    Last edited by Tahr; 11-02-2014 at 08:09 PM.

  2. #2
    Caretaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    9,518
    Your loads must be spot on mate
    A big fast bullet beats a little fast bullet every time

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,377
    Quote Originally Posted by 7mmsaum View Post
    Your loads must be spot on mate
    Yeah, its beaut. Thanks to you. 75.5grn R22, 3150 fps.
    What do you think about the shift in impact. Is that your experience too?

    Cheers

  4. #4
    Member Beetroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahr View Post
    Yeah, its beaut. Thanks to you. 75.5grn R22, 3150 fps.
    What do you think about the shift in impact. Is that your experience too?

    Cheers
    Bloody hell, I didn't think a 300WM could get 180's going that fast, that's honking along!

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Beetroot View Post
    Bloody hell, I didn't think a 300WM could get 180's going that fast, that's honking along!
    Got the load from the Nosler manual. It chronos at 3150 which is slightly faster than the velocity in the manual. And the trajectory confirms the chrono.
    Brians 300 winmag is doing 3100 with IMR 4831 & 180 grn. So it doesn’t seem to be exceptional for the calibre.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,017
    Are you happy with the scope now? that group with that load and calibre is bloody good.

  7. #7
    Gone But Not Forgotten Toby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Wouldn't you like to know
    Posts
    11,099
    What shift
    VIVA LA HOWA

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Toby View Post
    What shift
    Nah, the shift was on another target. It was an obvious shift in impact with the downwards pressure. I probably confused things by not posting a pic of the second target.

  9. #9
    Rabbit Herder StrikerNZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    South Canterbury
    Posts
    2,018
    I've found the standard remington synth stocks with their pressure points at the fore-end of the stock can be sensitive to varied pressure. In particular, I found bracing forward into the bipod gave me quite a different POI to neutral bipod pressure or shooting sticks. I assume as you brace forward on the bipod it'll be pulling the front of the stock downwards and away from the barrel slightly, lowering pressure on those forward bedding points.

    I also got some pretty wild results when using a rest in a weird position that squeezed the fore-end a bit much. Big vertical shift.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,377
    Quote Originally Posted by StrikerNZ View Post
    I've found the standard remington synth stocks with their pressure points at the fore-end of the stock can be sensitive to varied pressure. In particular, I found bracing forward into the bipod gave me quite a different POI to neutral bipod pressure or shooting sticks. I assume as you brace forward on the bipod it'll be pulling the front of the stock downwards and away from the barrel slightly, lowering pressure on those forward bedding points.

    I also got some pretty wild results when using a rest in a weird position that squeezed the fore-end a bit much. Big vertical shift.
    Cheers.
    The pressure point as been relieved. Its free floating.

  11. #11
    Member Shearer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Tasman
    Posts
    7,344
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahr View Post
    Cheers.
    The pressure point as been relieved. Its free floating.
    Perhaps if the stock is quite flexible it does touch if downward pressure is applied?
    My 300 doesn't group well unless the forend is held down firmly but I have never shot it applying pressure from the top.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Dannevirke, southern Ruahines
    Posts
    5,072
    you've changed

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Neckshot View Post
    you've changed
    Nah. But have had the 300mag for a few years and use it this time of the year when the deer are out scoffing and there is the odd longer shot. Kawekas in 3 weeks time and I intend to take it so was doing a bit of a sight in.

    But I really favour the lighter calibres and use the 223 or 243 the most.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,377
    Here’s a better comparison of the shift in the 2 holds.




  15. #15
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    25,071
    I would suggest using a method of shooting that works for you and sticking with it, why go from free recoil to holding down?
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!