Thread: Karamojo Bell comments

An excerpt from Karamojo Bells book from a farcebook group I visit.
Interesting reading especially his comments about shit english ammo and bullet weight which also point on why he he liked the 275 so much


THE
WANDERINGS OF AN
ELEPHANT HUNTER

BY
W. D. M. BELL

XV
RIFLES

The question of which rifles to use for big-game hunting is for each individual to settle for himself. If the novice starts off with, say, three rifles: one heavy, say a double ·577; one medium, say a ·318 or a ·350; and one light, say a ·256 or a ·240 or a ·276, then he cannot fail to develop a preference for one or other of them.

For the style of killing which appeals to me most the light calibres are undoubtedly superior to the heavy. In this style you keep perfectly cool and are never in a hurry. You never fire unless you can clearly see your way to place the bullet in a vital spot. That done the calibre of the bullet makes no difference. But to some men of different temperament this style is not suited. They cannot or will not control the desire to shoot almost on sight if close to the game. For these the largest bores are none too big. If I belonged to this school I would have had built a much more powerful weapon than the ·600 bores.

Speaking personally, my greatest successes have been obtained with the 7 mm. Rigby-Mauser or ·276, with the old round-nosed solid, weighing, I believe, 200 grs. It seemed to show a remarkable aptitude for finding the brain of an elephant. This holding of a true course I think is due to the moderate velocity, 2,300 ft., and to the fact that the proportion of diameter to length of bullet seems to be the ideal combination. For when you come below ·276 to ·256 or 6·5 mm., I found a bending of the bullet took place when fired into heavy bones.

Then, again, the ballistics of the ·275 cartridge, as loaded in Germany at any rate, are such as to make for the very greatest[180] reliability. In spite of the pressures being high, the cartridge construction is so excellent that trouble from blowbacks and split cases and loose caps in the mechanism are entirely obviated. Why the caps should be so reliable in this particular cartridge I have never understood. But the fact remains that, although I have used almost every kind of rifle, the only one which never let me down was a ·276 with German (D.W.M.) ammunition. I never had one single hang-fire even. Nor a stuck case, nor a split one, nor a blowback, nor a miss-fire. All of these I had with other rifles.

I often had the opportunity of testing this extraordinary little weapon on other animals than elephant. Once, to relate one of the less bloody of its killings, I met at close range, in high grass, three bull buffalo. Having at the moment a large native following more or less on the verge of starvation, as the country was rather gameless, I had no hesitation about getting all three. One stood with head up about 10 yds. away and facing me, while the others appeared as rustles in the grass behind him. Instantly ready as I always was, carrying my own rifle, I placed a ·276 solid in his chest. He fell away in a forward lurch, disclosing another immediately behind him and in a similar posture. He also received a ·276, falling on his nose and knees. The third now became visible through the commotion, affording a chance at his neck as he barged across my front. A bullet between neck and shoulder laid him flat. All three died without further trouble, and the whole affair lasted perhaps four or five seconds.

Another point in favour of the ·276 is the shortness of the motions required to reload. This is most important in thick stuff. If one develops the habit by constant practice of pushing the rifle forward with the left hand while the right hand pulls back the bolt and then vice versa draws the rifle towards one while closing it, the rapidity of fire becomes quite extraordinary. With a long cartridge, necessitating long bolt movements, there is a danger that on occasions requiring great speed the bolt may not be drawn back quite sufficiently far to reject the fired case, and it may become re-entered into[181] the chamber. This once happened to me with a ·350 Mauser at very close quarters with a rhino. I did not want any rhino, but the villagers had complained about this particular one upsetting their women while gathering firewood. We tracked him back into high grass. I had foolishly allowed a number of the villagers to come with me. When it was obvious that we were close to our game these villagers began their African whispering, about as loud, in the still bush, as a full-throated bass voice in a gramophone song. Almost immediately the vicious old beast could be heard tearing through the grass straight towards us. I meant to fire my first shot into the movement as soon as it became visible, and to kill with my second as he swerved. At a very few paces’ distance the grass showed where he was and I fired into it, reloading almost instantaneously. At the shot he swerved across, almost within kicking range, showing a wonderful chance at his neck. I fired, but there was only a click. I opened the bolt and there was my empty case.

I once lost a magnificent bull elephant through a ·256 Mannlicher going wrong. I got up to him and pulled trigger on him, but click! a miss-fire. He paid no attention and I softly opened the bolt. Out came the case, spilling the flake powder into the mechanism and leaving the bullet securely fast in the barrel lead. I tried to ram another cartridge in, but could not do so. Here was a fix. How to get that bullet out. Calibre ·256 is very small when you come to try poking sticks down it. Finally I got the bullet out, but then the barrel was full of short lengths of sticks which could not be cleared out, as no stick could be found sufficiently long, yet small enough. So I decided to chance it and fire the whole lot into the old elephant, who, meanwhile, was feeding steadily along. I did so from sufficiently close range, but what happened I cannot say. Certainly that elephant got nothing of the charge except perhaps a few bits of stick. That something had touched him up was evident from his anxiety to get far away, for he never stopped during the hours I followed him.

At one time I used a double ·450-·400. It was a beautiful[182] weapon, but heavy. Its drawbacks I found were: it was slow for the third and succeeding shots; it was noisy; the cartridges weighed too much; the strikers broke if a shade too hard or flattened and cut the cap if a shade too soft; the caps of the cartridges were quite unreliable; and finally, if any sand, grit or vegetation happened to fall on to the breech faces as you tore along you were done; you could not close it. Grit especially was liable to do this when following an elephant which had had a mud bath, leaving the vegetation covered with it as he passed along. This would soon dry and tumble off at the least touch.

I have never heard any explanation of the undoubted fact that our British ammunition manufacturers cannot even yet produce a reliable rifle cartridge head, anvil and cap, other than that of the service ·303. On my last shoot in Africa two years ago, when W. and I went up the Bahr Aouck, the very first time he fired at an elephant he had a miss-fire and I had identically the same thing. We were using ·318’s with English made cartridges. Then on the same shoot I nearly had my head blown off and my thumb severely bruised by an English loaded ·256. There was no miss-fire there. The cartridge appeared to me almost to detonate. More vapour came from the breech end than from the other. I have since been told by a great authority that it was probably due to a burst case, due to weak head. On my return I complained about this and was supplied with a new batch, said to be all right. But whenever I fire four or five rounds I have a jamb, and on investigating invariably find a cap blown out and lodging in the slots cut for the lugs of the bolt head. Luckily these cartridges are wanting in force; at one time they used fairly to blast me with gas from the wrong end. The fact that these faults are not conspicuously apparent in this country may be traced to the small number of rounds fired from sporting rifles, or, more probably, to the pressures increasing in a tropical temperature.

I have never been able to appreciate “shock” as applied to killing big game. It seems to me that you cannot hope to kill an[183] elephant weighing six tons by “shock” unless you hit him with a field gun. And yet nearly all writers advocate the use of large bores as they “shock” the animal so much more than the small bores. They undoubtedly “shock” the firer more, but I fail to see the difference they are going to make to the recipient of the bullet. If you expect to produce upon him by the use of big bores the effect a handful of shot had upon the Jumping Frog of Calaveras County, you will be disappointed. Wounded non-vitally he will go just as far and be just as savage with 500 grains of lead as with 200. And 100 grains in the right place are as good as ten million.

The thing that did most for my rifle shooting was, I believe, the fact that I always carried my own rifle. It weighed about 7 lb., and I constantly aligned it at anything and everything. I was always playing with it. Constant handling, constant aiming, constant Swedish drill with it, and then when it was required there it was ready and pointing true.

Interesting
This statement stuck out as the key to his success

" this style you keep perfectly cool and are never in a hurry. "

Interesting. Gotta say those fellas had balls of steel doing what they did, even if it was somewhat misguided with the future in mind.

Somewhere, and I’m buggered if I can find it now, I’ve got a book about Canadian fellas choosing to use .22 cal for grizzlies. It’s a book about building the pipelines / roads and keeping things going in the winter if it rings a bell for anyone. The indig fellas weren’t interested in big bangers, the view was you have one chance to shoot it in the head and you needed to be cool, calm, accurate. Cartridge of choice was the .22-250 Rem.

Originally Posted by Flyblown

Interesting. Gotta say those fellas had balls of steel doing what they did, even if it was somewhat misguided with the future in mind.

Somewhere, and I’m buggered if I can find it now, I’ve got a book about Canadian fellas choosing to use .22 cal for grizzlies. It’s a book about building the pipelines / roads and keeping things going in the winter if it rings a bell for anyone. The indig fellas weren’t interested in big bangers, the view was you have one chance to shoot it in the head and you needed to be cool, calm, accurate. Cartridge of choice was the .22-250 Rem.

Inuit Eskimo, "back in the day" favored the .222 because they could do it in small light rifles with ammo that weighed fuck all, on a dog sled or kayak it mattered, and they used it on polar bears! Think I'd want something a whole lot bigger.....

Originally Posted by 257weatherby

Inuit Eskimo, "back in the day" favored the .222 because they could do it in small light rifles with ammo that weighed fuck all, on a dog sled or kayak it mattered, and they used it on polar bears! Think I'd want something a whole lot bigger.....

Me too

But those guys who live in the land know their target so well that they can do this

I know an old possumer who mostly shoots with 22 WMR because he has a small rifle just in case he has to put down one of his horses
He's shot some pretty impressive red stags with that little rifle
He explained to me one night in front of a camp fire that he will have seen that stag most days for a week or even months before he goes to shoot it
He knows where he will be on a certain day in certain weather
He knows when he will be there
He knows who will be with him
He knows what he will be going to eat
So he's sitting somewhere along that old stags route to that place and he's there well before the stag
So he gets a very close clear shot with his 22 wmr
Like Bell job done

I remember reading somewhere that native North Americans would shoot bears by climbing a tree and waiting for the bear to climb up after them so they could shoot the bear in the eye with a 22 while it was paws were busy holding on. I guess it's slower climbing than running and can't swipe at you with it's claws while doing so but damned if you'd catch me trying that.
I heard a similar thing about hunting caribou/moose in the Arctic, locals will wait for one to swim across a lake or river, then pull up next to them and cap them in the head with a 38 revolver.

Originally Posted by 257weatherby

Inuit Eskimo, "back in the day" favored the .222 because they could do it in small light rifles with ammo that weighed fuck all, on a dog sled or kayak it mattered, and they used it on polar bears! Think I'd want something a whole lot bigger.....

Seals are the most commonly hunted game, shot in the head at ice breathing holes hence the 222 being carried. My guess is that Muskox and bears cop it in the head too.

whats the group called mate? I need more of that sort of content in my feed

he was a big fan of the 7x57 but liked that the 303 had a ten shot mag

I read way back that he would shoot the first elephant then climb up on top to get a bit of height to continue shooting the rest of the heard

absolutly horrid as I love elephants but man what an absolute legend and awesome adventure (and who give a flying fudd what I think about elephants)

Originally Posted by muzza

He also hunted elephants that had never been hunted before so had no fear , and also shot many elephants from atop a ladder in tall grass.
Can you imagine doing that today?

There were a couple of drawings from that excerpt that showed him shooting piggyyback from the shoulders of a native and also on a tripod. @Bill999 it is the NitroExpress.com farcebook page although I have visited that website proper and it has ebooks to read as well

Bell wasnt the only one using things like the .303 and 7x57 on elephants in those days. No one cared what you used, there was no laws about it. And FMJ miltary was about perfect bullets for it. Even in modern days when the game rangers were culling elephants in the 1980's they used to use SLR's and military ball.
I remember watching a documetary in Australia in the 1980's about a guy who was shooting buffalo for a mobile meat plant on a trailer that he had. He would shoot hundreds of them every week, all with a Ruger 77 in .308 using 147 grain military.

After about 1912, Bell seems to settle on the .318 Westley Richards as his ëlephant"rifle"" and used it for the rest of his career. When he went back to elephant shooting after WW1 he didnt use the .275 again. He did shoot most of his thousand elephants with a 7x57 (about 800) but he considered the .318 WR superior, if you could get reliable ammo.

after 1923 he spent the rest of his hunting life shooting red deer in Scotland with a .22 hipower, (in a littel Rigby- Mauser rifle) and then a Winchester model 70 in .220 Swift.

""Karamojo Safari"" is a better book to read than "Wanderings of an Elephant Hunter". It's all about just one safari, his last one into the Karamojo.

(Out of interest the next safari he did was into Uganda by way of the Sudan, and he went with his mate Harry Rayne, who was a New Zealander. (Who later became the Game warden for Kenya and wrote his own book called Ivory Raiders))

Bell wasnt the only one using things like the .303 and 7x57 on elephants in those days. No one cared what you used, there was no laws about it. And FMJ miltary was about perfect bullets for it. Even in modern days when the game rangers were culling elephants in the 1980's they used to use SLR's and military ball.
I remember watching a documetary in Australia in the 1980's about a guy who was shooting buffalo for a mobile meat plant on a trailer that he had. He would shoot hundreds of them every week, all with a Ruger 77 in .308 using 147 grain military.

After about 1912, Bell seems to settle on the .318 Westley Richards as his ëlephant"rifle"" and used it for the rest of his career. When he went back to elephant shooting after WW1 he didnt use the .275 again. He did shoot most of his thousand elephants with a 7x57 (about 800) but he considered the .318 WR superior, if you could get reliable ammo.

after 1923 he spent the rest of his hunting life shooting red deer in Scotland with a .22 hipower, (in a littel Rigby- Mauser rifle) and then a Winchester model 70 in .220 Swift.

""Karamojo Safari"" is a better book to read than "Wanderings of an Elephant Hunter". It's all about just one safari, his last one into the Karamojo.

(Out of interest the next safari he did was into Uganda by way of the Sudan, and he went with his mate Harry Rayne, who was a New Zealander. (Who later became the Game warden for Kenya and wrote his own book called Ivory Raiders))


Here is his .22 Hipower rifle, which he used on Red deer in Scotland. (Till he upgraded to a scoped .220 Swift)

Originally Posted by Flyblown

Interesting. Gotta say those fellas had balls of steel doing what they did, even if it was somewhat misguided with the future in mind.

Somewhere, and I’m buggered if I can find it now, I’ve got a book about Canadian fellas choosing to use .22 cal for grizzlies. It’s a book about building the pipelines / roads and keeping things going in the winter if it rings a bell for anyone. The indig fellas weren’t interested in big bangers, the view was you have one chance to shoot it in the head and you needed to be cool, calm, accurate. Cartridge of choice was the .22-250 Rem.

Look up Frank Glaser he used a 220 swift it might be who you are thinking about.

If you think bears are slow climbing trees watch this video https://youtu.be/9oqq70wx76U

Bell wasnt the only one using things like the .303 and 7x57 on elephants in those days. No one cared what you used, there was no laws about it. And FMJ miltary was about perfect bullets for it. Even in modern days when the game rangers were culling elephants in the 1980's they used to use SLR's and military ball.
I remember watching a documetary in Australia in the 1980's about a guy who was shooting buffalo for a mobile meat plant on a trailer that he had. He would shoot hundreds of them every week, all with a Ruger 77 in .308 using 147 grain military.

After about 1912, Bell seems to settle on the .318 Westley Richards as his ëlephant"rifle"" and used it for the rest of his career. When he went back to elephant shooting after WW1 he didnt use the .275 again. He did shoot most of his thousand elephants with a 7x57 (about 800) but he considered the .318 WR superior, if you could get reliable ammo.

after 1923 he spent the rest of his hunting life shooting red deer in Scotland with a .22 hipower, (in a littel Rigby- Mauser rifle) and then a Winchester model 70 in .220 Swift.

""Karamojo Safari"" is a better book to read than "Wanderings of an Elephant Hunter". It's all about just one safari, his last one into the Karamojo.

(Out of interest the next safari he did was into Uganda by way of the Sudan, and he went with his mate Harry Rayne, who was a New Zealander. (Who later became the Game warden for Kenya and wrote his own book called Ivory Raiders))


Here is his .22 Hipower rifle, which he used on Red deer in Scotland, about the same ballistics as a .223. (Till he upgraded to a scoped .220 Swift)