Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
Like Tree14Likes
  • 2 Post By grandpamac
  • 2 Post By grandpamac
  • 2 Post By Marty Henry
  • 1 Post By grandpamac
  • 1 Post By 35whelen
  • 2 Post By XR500
  • 4 Post By grandpamac

Thread: Mils and mrads

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,070

    Mils and mrads

    Greetings All,
    With more scopes having "mil" based reticles and adjustments I thought a few notes on Mils and mrads and the difference between them. The radian unit has been in use in mathematics has been in use for around 600 years although only given the name in the late 1800's. Its use in gunnery was realised early. 1 milliradian (mrad) works out to 1m at 1000m. There was however a problem. There are roughly 6,283.2 mrads to a full circle which gave gun layers fits so a round number, often 6,400, was used. The US turned up late to WW1 and with hardly any equipment. Some may have noticed that the steel helmets worn by US troops look just like the Brit ones which is because they were. Also there weren't enough Springfield rifles and no useable machine guns or artillery. French and other field guns were used which had mil based bearings. After the war the US adopted the mil (two different versions for a while) which later became standard for NATO.
    All very interesting you say but WTF does this have to do with scopes. The mrad is ideal for scope adjustments as 0.1 mrad is exactly 10mm at 100 metres. 0.1 mil is about 9.8mm at 100 metres. Unfortunately our US cousins are a mite careless with units and use the two units interchangeably. The Leupold background data states that their mil type reticles and adjustments are in mrad and many are so marked. I suspect other manufacturers may be the same.
    I saw an add for one of the new Bushnell scopes the other day in which they proudly stated that their clicks are exactly 0.1mil. I do hope they actually meant 0.1 mrad which would be much more useful.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    gerwyn.woods and CooeeBay like this.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Location
    auckland
    Posts
    950
    So 1/4 MOA would be a finer adjustment than 0.1mrad on a scope? (Assuming 0.1mrad clicks. Never used one)

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,070
    Quote Originally Posted by Pushover View Post
    So 1/4 MOA would be a finer adjustment than 0.1mrad on a scope? (Assuming 0.1mrad clicks. Never used one)
    Greetings Pushover
    Yes slightly. 1/4 MoA works out to a little over 7.3mm at 100 m and 0.1 mrad is 10 mm.. I think that there are some scopes are 0.05 mrad. I just checked the units used on the Hornady metric drop charts are actually mrads and not mil as stated. After working almost entirely in metric for over 45 years I find going back to UK units a real pain so work in metric as much as possible.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    Pushover and TimC like this.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    South
    Posts
    208
    good point, I just checked my applied ballistics app. only MIL option, no Mrad...

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Location
    auckland
    Posts
    950
    Quote Originally Posted by grandpamac View Post
    Greetings Pushover
    Yes slightly. 1/4 MoA works out to a little over 7.3mm at 100 m and 0.1 mrad is 10 mm.. I think that there are some scopes are 0.05 mrad. I just checked the units used on the Hornady metric drop charts are actually mrads and not mil as stated. After working almost entirely in metric for over 45 years I find going back to UK units a real pain so work in metric as much as possible.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    yes, thanks for that. I work in metric in everything except shooting/loading hahaha

  6. #6
    Member Marty Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tararua
    Posts
    7,088
    I doubt you would you even notice the 2. 8 mm difference between units that's 1/8 inch in old money.
    One of my scopes adjusts in half moa clicks and that's never been an issue. What spins my wheels is mil dot reticles with moa adjustments.
    Might not be useful but these are the approx angles in military mils (6400 to the circle) the fact that there are 6283 milliradians in a circle adding a few on makes no practical difference it's less than 2% and makes the math easier.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Marty Henry; 02-06-2021 at 12:33 PM.
    veitnamcam and grandpamac like this.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,070
    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Henry View Post
    I doubt you would you even notice the 2. 8 mm difference between units that's 1/8 inch in old money.
    One of my scopes adjusts in half moa clicks and that's never been an issue. What spins my wheels is mil dot reticles with moa adjustments.
    Greetings Marty Henry,
    Yes, not a union made in heaven. All three of my mil dot scopes are thus afflicted. I tend to use the knobs to zero for the load and ignore them thereafter. I seem to have quite a range of click values from 1 MoA 2.5 power Lyman, 2/3 MoA 8 power Lyman, a 6 power Pecar that could be 1/2 MoA or possibly 1 cm at 100m and others as well. Even a few friction adjusted ones. Keeps you on your toes as some are not marked.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    Pushover likes this.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawera
    Posts
    1,098
    I would expect most scopes to be basically 10mm per click at a 100m , you can always check it on a scaled post/tgt at 100m , Nato mils is just a rounded off version of actual , Russians use there own version I think its more actual.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Location
    .
    Posts
    165
    Here's some basic seat of your pants converts from Metrick to Imprill.....
    Or this link for exactness if your a profectionanal..... The further you shoot the more this matters. Extreme Spread matters most though I've found? when you get a new scope. Sight it in so it hits exactly where the crosshairs are placed. Then wind up 8clicks shoot , wind up another 8clicks shoot and then measure your results. Wind down 4clicks measure wind down 8clicks and measure. You should get even spaces between shot placings and now you should have custom click measurements to use with that ammunition.... I find this to be a real world solution for the rifle I'm sighting in.... I only worry about the Bloody wind>>>>
    https://metricunitconversion.globefe...sion_table.asp

    1/4 inch =6mm 1 click @ 100yrds 91.44meters
    1/2 inch =13mm
    1 inch = 25mm
    4 inches = 100mm
    veitnamcam likes this.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,070
    Quote Originally Posted by 35whelen View Post
    Here's some basic seat of your pants converts from Metrick to Imprill.....
    Or this link for exactness if your a profectionanal..... The further you shoot the more this matters. Extreme Spread matters most though I've found? when you get a new scope. Sight it in so it hits exactly where the crosshairs are placed. Then wind up 8clicks shoot , wind up another 8clicks shoot and then measure your results. Wind down 4clicks measure wind down 8clicks and measure. You should get even spaces between shot placings and now you should have custom click measurements to use with that ammunition.... I find this to be a real world solution for the rifle I'm sighting in.... I only worry about the Bloody wind>>>>
    https://metricunitconversion.globefe...sion_table.asp

    1/4 inch =6mm 1 click @ 100yrds 91.44meters
    1/2 inch =13mm
    1 inch = 25mm
    4 inches = 100mm
    Greetings 35whelen,
    I got a thorough grounding in UK to metric units in the mid 1970's. I was working as an architectural draughtsman and we were forever converting from feet, inches and fractions of an inch into metres and millimetres. We had a very useful table that helped with this. Affordable pocket calculators were still somewhere in the future. I was still needing to do the conversions from pre 1975 plans right up until I retired in 2015. Worth remembering is that 1 inch is exactly 25.4mm although at one time the UK inch was slightly shorter and the US inch slightly longer. Survey plans were in chains and links which we had to convert into metres, at least this was simpler than feet inches and fractions. Almost all US units were different to the UK ones, just another trap.
    Regards Grandpamac.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Central North Island
    Posts
    4,997
    Quote Originally Posted by grandpamac View Post
    Greetings 35whelen,
    I got a thorough grounding in UK to metric units in the mid 1970's. I was working as an architectural draughtsman and we were forever converting from feet, inches and fractions of an inch into metres and millimetres. We had a very useful table that helped with this. Affordable pocket calculators were still somewhere in the future. I was still needing to do the conversions from pre 1975 plans right up until I retired in 2015. Worth remembering is that 1 inch is exactly 25.4mm although at one time the UK inch was slightly shorter and the US inch slightly longer. Survey plans were in chains and links which we had to convert into metres, at least this was simpler than feet inches and fractions. Almost all US units were different to the UK ones, just another trap.
    Regards Grandpamac.

    Thats a bit of a blast from the past

    As a schoolboy I remember being a chainman for my godfather, surveying out the new Wellington dump location: having to hold the spring balance to keep the chain at a predetermined tension. I wonder if surveyors these days get shown all this sort of gear, that is really only one-two generations old
    chainsaw and grandpamac like this.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,070
    Quote Originally Posted by XR500 View Post
    Thats a bit of a blast from the past

    As a schoolboy I remember being a chainman for my godfather, surveying out the new Wellington dump location: having to hold the spring balance to keep the chain at a predetermined tension. I wonder if surveyors these days get shown all this sort of gear, that is really only one-two generations old
    Greetings XR500,
    Talk about blast from the past. My first job, other than mowing lawns, was a two week stint as a chainman's assistant for the May school holidays about 1964. My father had wangled it for me. The work was plotting the centre line for part of the Napier Hastings Expressway. The surveyors had been through and put in some set out points and we were working between them putting in pegs every chain or so. Wet days were spent making pegs out of the totara beams from the old Mohaka Bridge from the Napier Taupo Road. These were split from sections of beam and then shaped with a very sharp tomahawk. And we think that recycling is something new.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    Tui4Me, ANTSMAN, 30late and 1 others like this.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,908
    Memories. I still have a 10 chain steel chain with links etc lyi g about somwhere from forest service days. The fabric tapes were useless so we lugged around the steel chains and drums, abney levels a d slope correction tables.
    Summer grass
    Of stalwart warriors splendid dreams
    the aftermath.

    Matsuo Basho.

  14. #14
    Member stagstalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    North Island, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,190
    Always something to learn eh

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!