I'm aware that's one way to interpret it, but has it been tested? The other interpretation is the simple cause-and-effect link.
if it was the simple 'cause and effect", then every person who is 'annoyed' by a shooting range near them, could cause every person shooting to face prosecution. Is that the case?
19-10-2016, 03:40 PM
stretch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koshogi
if it was the simple 'cause and effect", then every person who is 'annoyed' by a shooting range near them, could cause every person shooting to face prosecution. Is that the case?
No, but perhaps because there is the 'reasonable cause' clause. I'll gladly believe 'so as to' = intent, if there any case law where this has been tested.
19-10-2016, 08:33 PM
Sideshow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tussock
Yep. And they would feel totally comfortable with that because they did not break "the rules" and can demand the moderators "rake people over the coals"
Actually if this was a moderated forum I would have culled them instantly for being involved in an argumen prior to making a contribution:D
Tussock YOU SILLY BILLY.....right where's me coals having trouble with getting the fire going:wtfsmilie: