Thread: Signature zee rings

I have one set, but I always wondered if it is such a good idea then why the rest do not follow? Why do we have 400 dollar "precision" rings?

Originally Posted by Ultimitsu

I have one set, but I always wondered if it is such a good idea then why the rest do not follow? Why do we have 400 dollar "precision" rings?

For guys who need to put all the flashest gear on there rifles as though they are trying to make up for something

The truth of it is you won’t see any advantage over a $130 set of z rings unless you’re running a 50bmg or something else massive
For normal caliber’s including large magnums once you have a solid set of rings like burris z or meany other options that won’t move that’s as much money as needs to be spent

Originally Posted by rambo-6mmrem

For guys who need to put all the flashest gear on there rifles as though they are trying to make up for something

The truth of it is you won’t see any advantage over a $130 set of z rings unless you’re running a 50bmg or something else massive
For normal caliber’s including large magnums once you have a solid set of rings like burris z or meany other options that won’t move that’s as much money as needs to be spent

Well... I am not one that spends 400 on precision rings but I am not so quick to dismiss them as veblen goods. I would like to see a study that looks into the marketed benefits of expensive rings and examination of whether these benefits exist and meaningful.

In another thread several months ago, I questioned the point of using steel for rings, given that aluminium rings are perfectly adequate and significant lighter for rings of the same strength . No one was able to give me a comprehensive, let along satisfying answer.