Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Night Vision NZ DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19
Like Tree28Likes

Thread: The trouble with holdovers

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    2,095

    The trouble with holdovers

    I was testing the trajectory of my 17HMR (17gr VMax).

    I sighted it in for 50m then shot at 197m with no hold over.
    This is the "tall target test".
    It is true. It shows the actual trajectory in cm.
    There is no distortion even if your clicks aren't exact or if your reticle or magnification are not to spec.
    The result was 5 shots striking 24cm below the aim point. The group was about 4cm tall, 15cm wide and 12 cm left of midline. Wind was about 2m/s from 2 O'clock. But I'm ignoring windage because my horizontal zero was spot on at 25 and 50m.

    OK 24cm at close enough to 200m is 1.2 Mils
    So hold over 1.2 mil dots ...

    Name:  17 HMR at 197m 800px  b 2024 03 31.jpeg
Views: 452
Size:  370.6 KB

    Blurg !
    4 shots are averaging 8cm lower than planned.
    The problem was that I had shot on 12x but the reticle is second focal plane and is calibrated at 10x.
    Those 1.2 Mil dots should be 1.2 x 20 = 24cm.
    But increasing the magnification to 12x expands the target underrneath the reticle by 1.2x.
    So what should have been 24cm is 24/1.2 = 20cm.
    Perhaps I was holding a bit less than I should have, distracted by the half mil hashes between the dots ?
    So the group was OK but not centred well enough to hit a hare at that distance.

    Then there is the shot near the top of the target, pretty much 1 Mil above the other 4. Another miss !
    I'm guessing I held over 2.2 mil dot instead of 1.2 mil dot. Easy to do. Looks like I did it.

    So, I'm thinking it would need quite a lot of drilling and visual training to hold over every time using mil dots and its not a reliable proposition for me with a second focal plane scope.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2023
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    694
    Or just use it at 10x where it's calibrated for, bit yes u right it does take practice to get to know your gear. Dedicated marksman in army was on range 3 -5 x a week
    Bagheera and MB like this.

  3. #3
    Caretaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    9,265
    Dial for your shots please

    Save yourself all the anxt
    A big fast bullet beats a little fast bullet every time

  4. #4
    Member Marty Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tararua
    Posts
    7,088
    Most of my scopes are 2nd focal, with practice it's not hard to remember the changes in angle magnification makes

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    21,166
    Rabbit shooting with a17 hmr, you have from the top of the head to the chest to sort your drop, I sight mine at 100 metres
    Growlybear likes this.
    Boom, cough,cough,cough

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    5,143
    Quote Originally Posted by 7mmsaum View Post
    Dial for your shots please

    Save yourself all the anxt
    Some scopes don't (even though they are supposed to be able to be dialled)... Knowing your gear and what it can do is more the key, along with good dope notes and doing the same routine every time (setting to the mag that the SFP is calibrated on - some SFP scopes don't actually have this marked on the mag ring and don't tell you in the manual which is a pain in the arse).

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Wairarapa
    Posts
    1,176
    You can also just figure out what the subtensions are between dots when the scope is set to 12x, if you’re using a chart, adjust the chart values to suit.
    Finding full magnification is usually easier than finding magnification setting two settings below full. Full can be found by feel.

  8. #8
    Member viper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Rabbitvegas
    Posts
    2,619
    I run a 17HMR a lot. I am sighted in ( zero ) at 100mtrs . This range covers 80% or the shots I need to take from 40 - 130 mtrs with basically point and shoot .
    Over the 130mtr mark to 190mtrs plus I just hold over. I have put so many rounds through the rifle I know instinctively how much hold over to use.
    It doesn't work 100% of the time but generally I am on the money.
    I can't be arsed with dial up as were I shoot has a lot of rabbits and it's too time consuming to be messing around with turrets.
    It may not be very hi tech but Kentucky windage works for me in my situation. instinctive, fast and effective for rabbits.

  9. #9
    Member Marty Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tararua
    Posts
    7,088
    I suspect you also developed a good eye for estimating range as well if your using a mildot style reticle

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,070
    Greetings,
    What was the actual velocity of the ammo fired and was it consistent?
    GPM.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    2,095
    Thanks GPM, no I didnt chrony it.
    I’ll get baCk to you with an est tried mv based on the true drop from the 200m tall target.

  12. #12
    Member viper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Rabbitvegas
    Posts
    2,619
    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Henry View Post
    I suspect you also developed a good eye for estimating range as well if your using a mildot style reticle
    You are correct, 9 years of shooting central Otago rabbits with talleys into the tens of thousands has turned range estimates into second nature. Also shooting the same farms has given me landmarks that I have shot from before or have a good estimation of the drop at that distance. My scope is just a cheap Nikko Stirling but it has hash marks on the reptile. What those marks mean i have no fucken idea, however I know just over 3 marks down gets me rabbit accurate at 190mtrs. It's hardly scientific but it is effective for my style of shooting.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Wairarapa
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by viper View Post
    You are correct, 9 years of shooting central Otago rabbits with talleys into the tens of thousands has turned range estimates into second nature. Also shooting the same farms has given me landmarks that I have shot from before or have a good estimation of the drop at that distance. My scope is just a cheap Nikko Stirling but it has hash marks on the reptile. What those marks mean i have no fucken idea, however I know just over 3 marks down gets me rabbit accurate at 190mtrs. It's hardly scientific but it is effective for my style of shooting.
    I am also unsure of hash marks on the reptile, but I agree with your methods. With my .22 I have simply checked drop in 10yd increments after 50yds. No calculator or MV needed, just real world data from simple real world testing. At that point the maths is redundant.

  14. #14
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    24,797
    Quote Originally Posted by Bagheera View Post
    I was testing the trajectory of my 17HMR (17gr VMax).


    .


    The problem was that I had shot on 12x but the reticle is second focal plane and is calibrated at 10x.


    Perhaps I was holding a bit less than I should have, distracted by the half mil hashes between the dots ?

    Another miss !
    I'm guessing I held over 2.2 mil dot instead of 1.2 mil dot. Easy to do. Looks like I did it.

    So, I'm thinking it would need quite a lot of drilling and visual training to hold over every time using mil dots and its not a reliable proposition for me with a second focal plane scope.
    HMMMMMMMM you have stated here you already KNOW WHAT PROBLEM/ISSUE IS ...so where is the problem again LOL.

    this is one of the advantages of a fixed power scope...nothing changes,its the same every time.
    it matters not if you do 10x or 12x if you do it every time and work out your marks etc beforehand..consistancy is and has always been the name of the game. repeatable consistancy is the be all and end all of hitting what you aiming at..always has been and always will be.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  15. #15
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    24,797
    a commercial fence batten is very consistant in length..... the distance plantation trees or vines are planted apart is also consistant...once you learn what they look like through scope at different given distances your half way there.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Brownells trouble
    By Tangobravo in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 19-07-2016, 07:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!