Thread: What's the Deal?

Yes and no, a light and heavy barrel subjected to the same heat input.
lets say light gets to 300dc and heavy gets to 100dc. The light will lose more heat to atmosphere even allowing for less surface area simply due to temperature differential to atmospheric temp.

Heat will conduct far quicker threw steel than air, touch a red hot bit of steel 820dc or wave your hand threw a lpg oxy flame 1200dc.

A heaver barrel will take longer to heat and cool down than a light, as a barrel heats the temperature differential between the flame front in your precious throat and barrel temp gets less and so does the rate of cooling of the throat.

If what you are worried about is the temp and subsequent erosion of the throat, then a heavy barrel will keep that throat cooler for longer of your first string of rapid fire. then it will take forever to cool.

Simple physics

If you take the same quantity of coffee,sugar,boiling water and cold milk and make one cup of coffee milk in cup first and another the same but milk last which will be hotter?

The coffee analogy

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

If you take the same quantity of coffee,sugar,boiling water and cold milk and make one cup of coffee milk in cup first and another the same but milk last which will be hotter?

So after seven pages we can conclude that Normie was .8 mill out because of the milk in his coffee

Originally Posted by sneeze

So after seven pages we can conclude that Normie was .8 mill out because of the milk in his coffee

Finally someone who understands me

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

Or was it too much coffee giving him the shakes?

I don't have milk in my coffee. Sorry fellas. Back to the drawing board.

My attempt at laymans terms for 3rd form physics was a fail then.
Basicly Tussoks rebuttal said exactly what i had just said

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2

And its hard to make a cup of coffee with no coffee :what:

Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2