Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Ammo Direct


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
Like Tree7Likes

Thread: 6.5-284 Muzzle brake comparision

  1. #1
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,684

    6.5-284 Muzzle brake comparision

    I did some load development on a Rem 700, when it showed up it had a brake I hadn't tested yet so took the opportunity, after asking the owner

    Here are the brakes I compared

    Prototype T1 Terminator, new style radial, T2 Terminator.



    Here is a video of it shooting 140 Amaxs at around 2900.



    There was very little difference in recoil reduction between the T1 & radial, but the T2 is ahead even though the through hole is for .284, not .264.

    When myself & another Forum member shot them for comparison, that was both of our thoughts.

    Including the opinion that the Radial wasn't particularly pleasant to shoot compared to the ported T1 & 2

    Considering the T2 Terminator has over twice the port face area it isn't supprising it performed better.
    Contact me for reloading components, brass, projectiles, powder, primers, etc

    http://terminatorproducts.co.nz/

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Terminat...?feature=guide

  2. #2
    L.R
    L.R is offline
    Member L.R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    674
    That radial seems bloody effective for a non directional brake.

  3. #3
    Gone But Not Forgotten Toby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Wouldn't you like to know
    Posts
    11,099
    Thats pretty sweet.
    VIVA LA HOWA

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Dannevirke, southern Ruahines
    Posts
    5,072
    I reckon theres very little btween the t1 and t2 maybe 15mm according to your board greg?? how much less dose it feel? and whats up with that radial.....im sure you told me they were pointless nice vid these are my fave's can you post up that pic of those projectilie's again

  5. #5
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,684
    Quote Originally Posted by Neckshot View Post
    I reckon theres very little btween the t1 and t2 maybe 15mm according to your board greg?? how much less dose it feel? and whats up with that radial.....im sure you told me they were pointless nice vid these are my fave's can you post up that pic of those projectilie's again
    There isn't much in it on the rig but on the end of the rifle it is very noticable.

    The T1 or T2 is much nicer to shoot with less recoil & without most of the crap floating around after the shot from the blast....
    Contact me for reloading components, brass, projectiles, powder, primers, etc

    http://terminatorproducts.co.nz/

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Terminat...?feature=guide

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Dannevirke, southern Ruahines
    Posts
    5,072
    they seem superior to me compared with the radial aye,do they foul up easily the t breaks?

  7. #7
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,684
    Quote Originally Posted by Neckshot View Post
    they seem superior to me compared with the radial aye,do they foul up easily the t breaks?
    I haven't noticed to much yet.
    The first ports will stay pretty clean, the last port may get a little carboned up.
    My APS PK brake on my 1st Edge would do that after heaps of shots.
    It depends on calibre.
    A hot ultrasonic cleaner gets them sparkling clean again.
    Contact me for reloading components, brass, projectiles, powder, primers, etc

    http://terminatorproducts.co.nz/

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Terminat...?feature=guide

  8. #8
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,684
    Quote Originally Posted by L.R View Post
    That radial seems bloody effective for a non directional brake.
    Yes it does work well for a radial, but it was only on a 6.5-284 with 140s going 2875 ish.

    Would be interesting to test a bigger one, on a bigger rifle.

    Still blows crap everywhere with noticable concussion, as a radial does.......
    Contact me for reloading components, brass, projectiles, powder, primers, etc

    http://terminatorproducts.co.nz/

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Terminat...?feature=guide

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Dannevirke, southern Ruahines
    Posts
    5,072
    are you testing it for comparrison's?. I think back to the breaks on the styer which were needed only on auto really even being a 5.56mm and they were a split type radial the only time i noticed it was sending shit every were was in close country or at night time with muzzel flash.

  10. #10
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,684
    Quote Originally Posted by Neckshot View Post
    are you testing it for comparrison's?. I think back to the breaks on the styer which were needed only on auto really even being a 5.56mm and they were a split type radial the only time i noticed it was sending shit every were was in close country or at night time with muzzel flash.
    Not sure on the brake you are talking about but a .223 only has 22-26 ish grains of powder, hardly enough to blow your nose compared to 50-80-100 grains

    If you have shot prone in the feild a radial braked rifle, you will know what I'm on about
    199p likes this.
    Contact me for reloading components, brass, projectiles, powder, primers, etc

    http://terminatorproducts.co.nz/

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Terminat...?feature=guide

  11. #11
    L.R
    L.R is offline
    Member L.R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    674
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi Greg View Post
    Yes it does work well for a radial, but it was only on a 6.5-284 with 140s going 2875 ish.

    Would be interesting to test a bigger one, on a bigger rifle.

    Still blows crap everywhere with noticable concussion, as a radial does.......
    Yeah I would agree I dont think the radial would be as effective on a large volume case. I guess its not so much the radial being not as effective as the directionals excelling with plenty of gas to direct rearward.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Dannevirke, southern Ruahines
    Posts
    5,072
    A slit type flash supressor which is a type of break isnt it? Why they have em i dont know R93 might be able to elaborate more on it being a ex grunt we never worried to much as it was something more to clean on the rifle!!.

  13. #13
    Member redbang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    682
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi Greg View Post
    Yes it does work well for a radial, but it was only on a 6.5-284 with 140s going 2875 ish.

    Would be interesting to test a bigger one, on a bigger rifle.

    Still blows crap everywhere with noticable concussion, as a radial does.......
    It's worth noting that the owner of that 284 with the radial has tried the same rifle with the T2 on it, and reckons the T2 is way nicer to use. Nicer to the point he's buying it ! !
    Anyone want to buy a little used radial
    Kiwi Greg, madjon_ and Toby like this.

  14. #14
    Fisher and Hunter leathel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Waikato.
    Posts
    793
    Yup that radial was great for lack of rifle movement....

    but any brake that has ports pointing to the ground sucks... shit in the face is not nice while trying to watch where the animal is going...or trying to spot your shot
    Fishing ... Hunting its all good

  15. #15
    Member mucko's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    12,627
    how do the breaks compare to using unbraked i mean its only 6.5mm why bother the amount of recoil would easly suppressed with a limbsaver and you dont ring your bell. i have a brake that come with my 243 absolute waste of time no difference in felt recoil
    von tempsky fan likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. T5 Muzzle brake.
    By Kiwi Greg in forum Terminator Products
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-05-2013, 10:55 AM
  2. barrel brake in
    By skeet72 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 13-01-2013, 12:35 AM
  3. Suppressor vs Muzzle brake
    By ARdave in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 14-08-2012, 12:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!