I see that he gave his firearms to another FAL holder stating that they once belonged to his farther.
Can't see anything wrong with that in general. There still under lock and key and he would not have direct access to them.
Yes I'd take his FAL license away if these allegations are true. (His firearms can then be past to another family member with the correct FAL so that the family heirlooms are not destroyed).
But I would also do similar to what he has done if I was getting divorced or had any altercation where I thought my FAL would be in jeopardy. From what has been printed in the press the police seem to have this right. Which is good, but why do (separate issue) do gang members and associates still have FAL? You just need to have them drive past to feel threatened.
I do hope that this is not a witch hunt! With the powers that be trying to shut up our right to protest! That would be JUST as alarming as what this chap has allegedly done.
Bookmarks