If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
The wording of required security refers to "firearm" .
But many owners,like me, feel that a rifle without the bolt is not dangerous and may warrant few security precautions.
In particular, preventing a firearm from being stolen from a vehicle while popping in to pay for petrol or at the public convenience could be achieved 100% by taking the bolt with you. Yet somehow I feel the police may not be sympathetic.
Is a person guilty of incorrect storage if an unsecured rifle is stolen but not the bolt ?
Yes. Because a firearm is still a firearm even if it doesn't have the bolt in it. Read the Arms Act.
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!
Bookmarks