Thread: How to immobilise old fiream to create safe wall hanging

Duck Duck Go found it easily - NOT Google, which I haven't used for many years.

Originally Posted by Billymavs

I have been present for a similar process pre 2019 for two No3 mk1* rifles, the requirement was any and all load bearing parts and any moving components must be structurally compromised and incapacitated in a manner that is irreparable.

So the list included a 9’ 1.5mm slit from chamber to rifling, with a large hole underneath the chamber, which conveniently helped to weld the bolt face solid to the barrel and action

Two holes along the length of the barrel one underneath and one on top

Bolt weakend and cross cut underneath through 50% of the mass and all channels and holes filled with weld.

Bolt welded from under magazine well to action

Magazine welded in place with no internals, and magazine catch welded, witness hole drilled in the bottom.

Sear and fire control components removed, area filled with metal and welded.

Trigger welded solid

Saftey welded in “safe position”

Rod pressed into barrel, welded in place 2’ back from muzzle and via aforementioned large holes drilled in barrel.

All of the slicing and holes were hidden under the wood and one could barely tell, somewhat an art from in its own right.

They were sent off to Wellington for a check with the anmourer and deemed acceptable for public display.

They were for or a part of some of Peter Jackson’s WW1 displays in Wellington, although I’m not entirely sure why he required genuine rifles that a prop couldn’t fill in, but he owns more guns than all of us put together so, can’t blame him for wanting the real deal.

As to the legality of them now, I have no idea, but back then they were fine for handling and promotional shoots in public, I’d love to know what became of them.

One would think someone could find a sporter with a full length clapped out barrel and sloppy bolt to restore with repro wood than mutilate a bona fide piece.

Originally Posted by inglishill

Thank you.

Google didn't really produce a judgement by Mallon, I did find this though https://www.nzlii.org/cgi-bin/sinodi...ry=R%20Lincoln is this the case you were talking of? I realise it is a different Judge but can not locate the judgement you are talking of.

taking the piss are we-your implied tone makes me think of a lawyer in the old bailey comments underwritten with a slight sarcasm . anyhow im out .

Originally Posted by kotuku

taking the piss are we-your implied tone makes me think of a lawyer in the old bailey comments underwritten with a slight sarcasm . anyhow im out .

Look I am unsure why there is such hostility to what I have written. It is all said in good faith and can be taken at face value. It would seem to me that this issue lies within a faction membership and potentially historical stuff that I have no idea about. At any rate, any implication of tone you derive is of your own doing, chase your own shadows if you like but leave me out of it.

Originally Posted by inglishill

No, well, I don't know who Sidney is. Maybe people call me Sidney behind my back.

If you are implying that I may be anyone other than who I am presenting, then No, I am not this Sidney you speak of.

What planet are you from??? Laws tell you what you can't do...they tell you what is correct/ expected but via the..any more or less than this is bad. Look at where law came from originally. The wording goes..thou shan't desire the ox or ass..... Not you may lust after Mary Jane.

Originally Posted by Micky Duck

What planet are you from??? Laws tell you what you can't do...they tell you what is correct/ expected but via the..any more or less than this is bad. Look at where law came from originally. The wording goes..thou shan't desire the ox or ass..... Not you may lust after Mary Jane.

I don't get it...... I guess you are suggesting that my assertion that laws can tell you what to do is wrong? I was never saying they don't tell you what you can't do, I was answering a specific post and the way it was written.

I don't know who Sidney is, is that what you are on about?

Sorry your post was somewhat garbled and contradictory and I don't really understand what you are trying to say.

'Laws tell you what you can't do' - yeah I agree.

'they tell you what is /correct/expected but via the.... - via the what?

'any more or less than this is bad' - any more or less than what?

Although the 10 Commandments may have been a founding for our laws they are not indicative of how they are written now. I don't see the relevance of this. Please, by all means correct me.

What planet am I from? Well, one that can hold an adult conversation without being drawn into an internet forum popularity contest that involves unnecessary vitriol towards someone who has an alternative view. Some of you seem to be insinuating things on my behalf, I have no idea why. At any rate, it seems that personal insults and ostracization for challenging a narrative are common place here which is indicative of an echo chamber. Some people have been more than reasonable.

24B

Originally Posted by Micky Duck

What planet are you from??? Laws tell you what you can't do...they tell you what is correct/ expected but via the..any more or less than this is bad. Look at where law came from originally. The wording goes..thou shan't desire the ox or ass..... Not you may lust after Mary Jane.

Give it up MD - this cunt's either trolling or on the Aspie spectrum

Originally Posted by 308

Give it up MD - this cunt's either trolling or on the Aspie spectrum

Here you go again with the vitriol for no apparent reason.

What ever happened to Richard Lincoln? Does anyone know.