OK - how could you possibly assume outcome before the event? Insulated? There has to be reason to escape conviction - do you think standing in the dock they feel insulated? Find me a statistical breakdown of repeat offenders who have been given a chance compared to those convicted in the first place. Pretty dam low I would think.
Establish the problem... because printing a list of rugby player who received that second chance is pure distortion isn't it? What about the numbers of gen pop people who also have that opportunity? Uni students, first time offenders, young offenders, out of character incidents, otherwise contributing members of society etc..
This is emotive crap couched in a misunderstood emotional appeal to equity, without considering the bigger issues.
Bookmarks