@small_caliber. Where did you get that bullet pointed text?You will probably find this kind of behaviour more common in the future with the police putting more restrictions and compliance costs on ranges.
These compliance costs will contribute to the closure of ranges due to nobody wanting to pay to use them and the organisations running them having insufficient fund to keep up the certifying and compliance costs.
From the police
o New Zealand Police is now a regulator using regulatory principals. The discussions in
this group will help make decisions on what the range standard is for each discipline,
and this will enable everyone to comply with these standards.
o That there are only about 50,000 firearms licence holders who are part of shooting
clubs, out of roughly 250,000 firearms licence holders. That means 80% of licence
holder are not parts of clubs. A lot of the work will be in the ad hoc ranges used by
these 80%.
o An issue is between sighting in once off versus regular occurrence, e.g. competition.
Focus of the Act are the ranges with regular occurrences. By focusing on these types
of ranges the standards will give authority to committees and bodies who have done
very good work in making safe ranges available to club members and the public.
o Acknowledging that ad hoc ranges will exist and that Police as the regulator will
most likely not know about many of them due to their ad hoc nature. This is an
opportunity to develop a number of FAQs for potential users of ranges/people who
want to set up ad hoc ranges, and to make it easy for these licence holders to set up
their ranges safely and shoot safely.
Would shooting at signs now mean these are ad hoc ranges?
Bookmarks