It's his party, he chooses the music hahahaQuote:
Originally Posted by Beavis
Printable View
It's his party, he chooses the music hahahaQuote:
Originally Posted by Beavis
In saying that, I like this song...Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy
Really?! That has to be one of the most Politically Correct but completely incorrect posts on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney
The greatest tragedy in Mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion.
TruthQuote:
Originally Posted by Savage1
I was going to go with 'bullshit' myself, I guess that means we disagree :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy
I was only talking about the religion part of the post, guns don't make "nut jobs".
:huh:
Wow I think this thread has gone a bit off base. I would like to blame the Australian.
well if you're gonna mention religion,I'm gonna mention Hitler.
Hitler.
MARK
Moral of the story is "convicts shouldn't have guns". ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by 300CALMAN
I take your point and accept that mine is a gross generalisation, however in my eyes religious fanaticism is still religion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney
This waste has been happening for thousands of years and no doubt will continue to do so for a long time to come. Having experienced murder on an extremely personal level at the hand of someone doing their gods work, I hope you'll understand why I struggle to be as smart as you suggest. I will admit to finding your post naive, but also accept that mine is prejudiced.
It is pure evil that someone can be motivated to take another life for no other reason than an opposing belief.
@MassiveAttack and others.Quote:
Originally Posted by MassiveAttack
Hey I think this is a topic for another day
probably another forum.
Just sayin, at the moment.
Actually it is the same thing... I wasn't talking about the veracity of either subject, merely the comparison of how people choose to treat them and the hypocrisy of that...Quote:
Originally Posted by MassiveAttack
The reality of the many adherents who cause no offence, issues or violence being judged by the actions of the few that do....
Is that any clearer for you....?
No mate not you. In a round about way we have shot together but we were at different sides of the paddock :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rushy
Sidney , you have had time to read my post
So
Stop it.
300CLAMAN
I have deleted your posts,
if anybody else carries on like this I will lock the thread.
Guys we all have fervent and passionate viewpoints on the subject matter in this thread and I support everyone's right to have their personal view but we need to heed the warnings that are being given. By my count we are at two strikes and a ball. Jakewire I applaud your approach.
Savage1 you may well have just coined one of the top fifty most well reasoned one line statements of all time without even intending to do so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Savage1
Yep, the ignorance on the anti-gun side beggars belief frankly, even the so called academics dont seem to accept the statistics. Just reading the anti-gun comments and I can see how clueless they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beavis
Things like ban "assault weapons" yet most mass killings in the USA are with handguns. Which makes sense actually, easy to hide so you can get into the school un-noticed, and you dont want a "long ar15" when you walk into a class room. Surely you want a handgun (plus a spare in a holster) in each hand holding 15 rounds each or even one of those snail mags holding a shag load of rounds and just start blasting at 5metres.
had an interesting "discussion" with some americans they were all for banning ARs but wanted to keep their handguns for their own self-defence. Yets when I pointed out most killings were with handguns (accidents, mass killings, self-defence etc) they just could not accept that they and their handguns were the biggest problem and the easiest fix.
No such thing when it comes to gun control in the USA.Quote:
Originally Posted by steven
Even if you banned handguns today, you would still have 50-90 million in circulation. How many of those do you think would be voluntarily surrendered?
What a load of horseshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by R93
If you are sweeping your team mates while scanning your arcs, you doing it wrong!
Unless your fellow patrol members are ANA.....
I'm glad you agree with R93, and think it's a good idea to point a loaded firearm at your comrades....
If I need to tell you how NOT to point a firearm at somebody, I'm probably wasting my time.
Ya, I've been on a patrol or two champ.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Care to list you experience?Quote:
Originally Posted by Koshogi
I don't know what R93's experience is but from previous posts I gather he knows a thing or two and I rate his contributions quite highly.
I've listed my experience previously.Quote:
Originally Posted by Savage1
I'm sure R93 is both experienced and highly qualified in the skill of arms.
Experience doesn't always equate to competence (I'm not saying he is not competent. I just disagree with his opinion on this matter).
Just think for yourself. Does the idea of pointing a loaded firearm at people sound like a smart idea?
Just because it is taught in the military doesn't mean it's a good thing.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Yes I have read your "Experience". I am just wondering how you would skin the cat so to speak? You did say that R93 is did/doing it "wrong"...Quote:
Originally Posted by Koshogi
Just remember that you are not the only one here that has had military experience so be careful how you word things in relation to a persons "competence".
Fuck hang on chaps I'll just grab another beer this is going to get good
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Fair enough😆 I must have been doing/taught wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Koshogi
I have been told that a few times when I was young and eager........mainly by women.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
I thought there was more than enough bait in the water to get a decent bite. [emoji476]Quote:
Originally Posted by R93
Same, very controlled response though!!Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwijames
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Meh. I just woke up. On night shift.
Having a brew with a couple ex diggers now and they were not favorable to the suggestion that it doesn't happen.
But then again what would they know.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
:x_x: wait and the thread is OFF COURSE AGAIN!!!
Time to buy another six pack and make myself comfortable :yaeh am not durnk:
For kiwis that do not know, the term "champ" used in Australian military circles is actually one of the lowest insults you can dish out or receive.
Noted.😆
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Glad I was not the only one who picked up that term...
I always thought "Jack c@nt" was the lowest. We used "champ" more as a friendly taunt.Quote:
Originally Posted by R93
YMMV
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Agreed but in a theatre of war it probably does make it a necessary thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Koshogi
Depending on the tone yes that would be up there.
Anyway @Koshogi, I am still waiting for your "method" to patrolling as we clearly are doing it wrong...
Attachment 42274Quote:
Originally Posted by Shooter
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
As I thought. The way we patrol is "horseshit" but the way you patrol is with a clown.
We will continue on as we have, with the "Educated and accepted risk" of patrolling with intent regardless of what is presented within our arcs.
No wonder everyone thinks gun owners are mental
What!!! NZ Army doctrine isn't going to change based on the opinion of some random guy on an internet forum? What a load of horseshit!Quote:
Originally Posted by Shooter
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
