Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Ammo Direct Terminator


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 191
Like Tree285Likes

Thread: New gun security laws

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Member Savage1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    3,529
    Quote Originally Posted by Jexla View Post
    You heard it here first folks, no A cat rifle can hold more than 7 rounds.
    Better hand in your Troy pump actions to Savage1 directly.



    Chop chop chop, swap swap swap, they simply don't give a fuck about e cat rules.



    A criminal doesn't care, he'll do it anyway, the firearm is stolen anyway and he's trying to kill people, why would he care?
    Also you have a bigger problem to worry about than a pointy thing at the end of the gun.



    Guess what that means? You could even make an A cat one too!



    Well that sure would stop a criminal using a stolen A cat AR, he'd never dare to use a 30 round mag in it and risk being done for having an E cat gun right?



    Didn't need your permission (Believe it or not).


    Think you overall missed the boat here Savage.
    Stealing an A cat AR vs an E cat AR makes not a single drop of difference, both can fit normal capacity magazines. Both can have pistol grips. Both can even be converted to full auto.
    All of those are facts.

    EDIT:
    P.S Shout out to those PMing me.
    See now you're just moving the goal posts to cover your argument. Now you're talking about guns being modified, essentially making them a different category. As I was talking about rates of fire I was obviously talking about semi autos.

    Good luck getting an mp5 on a cat considering it has a freestanding pistol grip and telescopic stock.

    So your logic is that a cat is just as deadly as e cat because it can be modified to e cat making it an e cat, therefore an a cat isn't as deadly as an e cat. Makes perfect sense. You also admit that they can be converted to c cat, therefore making c cat no more deadly than a cat by your logic, however you said that c is more deadly than a cat. Since they can be chopped then they're all as deadly as a pistol?

    You're not the only one that gets PMs.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Our gun laws
    By Dannz in forum Firearm Safety
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 16-01-2015, 08:56 PM
  2. New Gun laws
    By RichieRich in forum Hunting
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-01-2013, 10:04 AM
  3. New laws in Australia
    By Bavarian_Hunter in forum Hunting Dogs
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27-11-2012, 06:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!