Thread: New Updated Arms Code 2017

gadge u could have a very big head, what has that got to do with the size of your IQ? thats not how it works.. lol

didn't say they were incorrect, you just don't appear to understand them - the other words they use to convey meaning, also have meaning

u must have missed this bit.. well apparently u have missed all the other argument..

It must be an intentional plan formed by mutual agreement, to do something that for all intents and purposes reaches the level of illegality or similar level of seriousness. That result must be achievable, but does not have to be achieved.

the point being that it doesn't.. it has to be an objective assessment of a serious nature not subjective disadvantage to a small group...

Its also within the legal purvue of the police role... so it still doesn't apply..

C'mon claim IQ... be nice to see some use for it

Originally Posted by Sidney

gadge u could have a very big head, what has that got to do with the size of your IQ? thats not how it works.. lol

didn't say they were incorrect, you just don't appear to understand them - the other words they use to convey meaning, also have meaning

u must have missed this bit.. well apparently u have missed all the other argument..



the point being that it doesn't.. it has to be an objective assessment of a serious nature not subjective disadvantage to a small group...

Its also within the legal purvue of the police role... so it still doesn't apply..

C'mon claim IQ... be nice to see some use for it

And some comprehension in return would come in handy too. That criteria is not required to be met. As has been stated many, many, many times this is the common non legal system use of the word. You are yet again trying to meet some threshold that is inapplicable.

And you are right about head size, I have trouble finding helmets small enough. Ended up changing motorbikes to one that matched the only helmet I could buy that fitted.