If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
Do you think the cops/AO would apply the same reasoning to something like a pistol grip and adjustable stock that was fitted to a bolt action A cat firearm? I would think in most circumstances they would apply a little commonsense and logic to, however that being said if you did something to piss them off it would make for a perfect excuse for them to nail you on something to start with and then continue digging further.
Wonder if it is possible to have an exemption given when having both a A cat AR15 and A cat bolt action with features that could be transferred to the AR making it an MSSA can be obtained? Would think you would receive more leniency if you declared it?
Interesting points. I also wonder if this might make a good reason for an application for an e-cat endorsement. It makes sense in such circumstances that security should be of e-cat standard.
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!
Bookmarks