Thread: Is Police Response Rate 2 Firearm Thefts Good Enough? "Caller Mike" Again.

Originally Posted by Tertle

No, ill leave it to arm chair quarterbacks and critics! you seem to have it all sussed

Typical response that was to be expected cheers for your input

Originally Posted by Sideshow

Typical response that was to be expected cheers for your input

In all honesty, he is in a position where commenting could have a reflection on his employment. I know in my industry there are things I can say publicly and things I cannot. A lot has to do with privacy of our clients as well as sensitive business information and there are clauses in contracts regarding commenting on an employer in the public domain. I may or may not agree with my employers decisions but while I am welcome to discuss these difference with my employer directly and without ramification, to do so in a public forum would likely have serious consequences especially when it could put me in breach of my employment contract. For @Tertle to go further into some of these subjects I would expect he would have simlar or even more stringent clauses in his contract that means he needs to be diplomatic and careful. I have met tertle on a few occasions and, for what its worth, like most in his position, he strikes me as a decent, straight up fellow.

Originally Posted by Cordite

@timattalon

I have no problems with the cops' priorities (deduced from what what they actually spend their time doing - the true test), namely ticketing speeding drivers. Thumbs up, even if it means they attend later or not at all at a gun burglary. Danger to life takes priority; danger to many lives more so.

The only real problems are Mr Chris Cahill's flapping lips and long nose.

Attachment 83671

Oh how right you are @Cordite.

Originally Posted by timattalon

In all honesty, he is in a position where commenting could have a reflection on his employment. I know in my industry there are things I can say publicly and things I cannot. A lot has to do with privacy of our clients as well as sensitive business information and there are clauses in contracts regarding commenting on an employer in the public domain. I may or may not agree with my employers decisions but while I am welcome to discuss these difference with my employer directly and without ramification, to do so in a public forum would likely have serious consequences especially when it could put me in breach of my employment contract. For @Tertle to go further into some of these subjects I would expect he would have simlar or even more stringent clauses in his contract that means he needs to be diplomatic and careful. I have met tertle on a few occasions and, for what its worth, like most in his position, he strikes me as a decent, straight up fellow.

Yep I fully understand that hence the in the last post.
Also why I didn’t post which relative, just a relative.