If the Courts granted a Protection Order then they must have concerns.
He can challenge it and if its proven unfounded, then it will get dismissed. And he gets his firearms back, depending on circumstances of what happened when they tried to seize them.
Judges always go on the side of caution, then Police execute the direction of the courts which is to seize firearms as you cannot hold them without the courts approval. You can have firearms and have a protection order if the court approves. Not very common, but it has been done. Especially if the only form of income is provided by having to have firearms, such as a gunsmith, dealer and so forth.
But with the media, how do we actually know what happened or what the actual circumstances are.
I'm sure he will appeal the Protection Order and it will all come out when both sides are heard.
Bookmarks