They're probably better off without him by the sound of it. And were you really seriously suggesting that you couldn't work on a dairy farm without a firearms licence?Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
Printable View
They're probably better off without him by the sound of it. And were you really seriously suggesting that you couldn't work on a dairy farm without a firearms licence?Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
Hmmm-got me suspicions somethings adrift in the top 2"-you know the grey stuff that stops ya eyeballs from flyinout the back of your swede and your ears from committing incest!
furthermore what sticks out like dogs bolloxis a manifest anger problem and an inabuility to indulge in controlled use of alcohol.
no doubt as usual the legal dept will say im talking through a hole in me hat!
Mr legal beagle if i was his family id be disowning the bloody clown PERMANENTLY
No. But it could be a requirement for the particular job he was doing.Quote:
Originally Posted by GravelBen
Golden OldiesQuote:
Originally Posted by systolic
He is a fuckwit. Simple. Needs the bash and his hands broken- simple.
His family should suffer for his actions the same as If I stuff up and go to jail. Mortgage doesn't get paid lose the house. My fault.
he also shouldn't have a firearms license. We have a member on this forum that missed out on getting a firearms license because he called lifeline for help 3 years ago.
This fuckwit made threats weeks previously, actually shot at people (as good as) with a pretty serious weapon as in not a silly little airsoft or a weak slug gun, and still keeps his license? Surely not.
And his actions screw us all over and give the anti's ammunition to restrict our goings on.
Major oxygen thief.
"could be a requirement "FFS a bloody phrase beloved of the legal profession asnd dopey academics ,meaning" well the thought just drifted through my swede " .admit it ,this goma is so bloody far in the wrong he makes jamie lee ross a worthy candidate for the next pope. If the beak had been on song a s38 wouldnt be a miss
dont try it on bro -I was and still am a fully trasined RC altarboy -still licensed for concelebrated masses .youre warned!
I simply can't believe that he would still have his FAL, and I doubt he has.
Under the Arms Act, any commisioned police officer can revoke someone's FAL. It doesn't have to go through the courts, so I suspect (hope!) it was revoked but not reported in the article as it wasn't part of the court process/sentencing.
I think we should all dress up as ignorant people and demand the judge be banned or at least registered and stored in a concrete strong room at the local court house.
Also would be a sensible idea to limit all judges capacity and remove their bayonet lugs.
REMEMBER PEOPLE, THESE JUDGES ARE DANGEROUS WEAPONS AND SHOULD NOT BE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.
Im gonna quit my job, ditch my shoes and walk the length of NZ carrying a flag proclaiming the outrage of the people regarding this issue.*
*Some and/or all statements are fictitious and/or misleading in every way.
Like what?Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
Maybe you have no idea what you are talking about and are just guessing.
I seriously doubt that there is a requirement to have a firearms license for farm job...of any level. Useful yes...requirement ....hmm nah. Plenty of people around in the rural sector with a firearm or access to one.Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last I sat mine I was really suprised how many Filipinos were sitting there license to , all on the back of the no clubbing calf’s no doubt & fare enough but end of the day the justice system has let NZ down again or maybe it’s just us law abiding firearms owners that have had all this safety and common sense drumbed into us we have lost sight of what’s actually going on in the eyes of the law...man drinks beer & fires pot shots at neighbours “judge” oh well you didn’t hit anyone and u were pissed ...oh go on then home D , no u won’t loose ur job and maybe that scallywag neighbor and his 4 kids needed a hurry up , keep your nose clean for the next 5 years and you can reapply for your license , p.s you won .
maybe us lot are taking things to seriously...got me thinking my neighbors got some turkeys that are really pissing me off I’m thinking I could let loose with a box of buckshot into his coup and I’ll be sweeeeeet oh I’ll drink some jimmy before hand to make sure it’s more his fault rather than mine :)
What if part of his job was shooting rabbits, possums, goats, deer and other pests? And home killing stock?Quote:
Originally Posted by tiroatedson
Who knows what his boss pays him to do?
My mate kept his driver licence after being done for DIC.Quote:
Originally Posted by 7mmwsm
The judge accepted he needed to drive for his job and losing his licence would mean losing his job, unable to pay mortgage, drive kids to school, sport etc.
Why shouldn't it be the same for a firearms licence?
I like your thinking, if we all said we were taxi drivers we could drink beer and drive happy in the knowledge we won’t loose our Driver’s License as we need it for our jobQuote:
Originally Posted by systolic
Still have to convince the judge.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boaraxa
Because clearly he is not a fit and proper person to hold a firearms license.Thus he is not suitable for that job if it requires a license.Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
He has proven that it puts other peoples lives at risk. He has proven beyond any doubt that he lacks the judgement for safe firearms handling. If he is only a moron when he is drunk then perhaps he should have decided NOT TO DRINK while he was still sober. Drink is not an excuse. We know we can make dumb decisions when drunk but perhaps the dumb decision was to drink to start with and he made that call while sober.
This is not one accidental discharge, the guy was shooting at their house and then their car. This is not like simple drunk driving it's trying to mow people down with a car while drunk. FFS if he still has his license then the Judge and the police involved should be all fired.
hmmm-just finished reading the book on stan graham a coast cockie who went on a shooting spree in 1941-got pissed off with neighbours rest is tragic history.The pair had more than a few similarities in their behavioural traits which it appears some are oblivious to.where chris bloody cahill head police union twerp in all of this .suprised he didnt offer an opinion,or does he lack the spine.
The movie was well done for a NZ one I thought.
How would you, I, or anyone apart from the employer and employee know what the job description was?Quote:
Originally Posted by 7mmwsm
What makes you think he might still have a firearms licence?Quote:
Originally Posted by 300CALMAN
Who said he's being replaced?Quote:
Originally Posted by 7mmwsm
Highly unlikely on a dairy farm at Kaihere. The odd goat and deer in the hills but not on the plains, and very few people process their own homekill cattle.Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
And euthanising stock can be done with a captive bolt gun, which doesn't require a FAL. Increasingly common on dairy farms now.
@kotuku Good to see wasn't the only one that cottoned onto the reference about "bad blood" in the article. I actually thought that was in pritty bad taste from the jurno that wrote it:(Quote:
Originally Posted by kotuku
The expression 'bad blood' is very common one in relation to a feeling of ill will, anger, or hostility between people. Hard to how using it can be in bad taste when referring to this incident, just because of a 36 year old movie about another mental farmer with guns.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sideshow
go read the bloody book you fool-jesus wept "mental farmer"-what bloody decade are you from???no wonder people give you grief!Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
well spoken from the profession of "thieving lawyers??'
betcha that fucking adjective put a crease on the other side of the undershot chin!!
I don't but that's why I used the word IF It was my response to your Trolling/SpeculatingQuote:
Originally Posted by systolic
Attachment 98450Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
Guess you should have gone to speck savers then!Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
Not really. That is WHAT they used and WHERE they found it - not the same as answering WHY they used it.Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
We don't know for certain WHY they used it, but it may be reasonably deduced from the (intentional) effect of the article.
The use of the image in this article, with its MSSA caption, has the effect of suggesting a guy used a .308 MSSA against his neighbours.
The motivation behind this could be just because the journalist's integrity has been prostituted to sensationalism... or because of some Australian type gun control agenda which no inconvenient fact must stand in the way of... or both.
Probably just easier to cut and paste the photo. Just like the photo of Stubbings is taken from Facebook too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cordite
Makes more sense than a conspiracy against guns, gun owners or shooting in general.
You could be correct. It may not be a conspiracy against guns. You may have inadvertently stumbled onto the truth. Its a millennial conspiracy against having to make an effort to find the truth....if its in face book it must be true, besides it's too hard to actually find out facts.....The true conspiracy of presenting poorly edited and written articles in the hope that we will accept the lower standards and reward them for doing half the job they are supposed to be doing.Quote:
Originally Posted by systolic
"Conspiracy" is a word I did not use, and I agree with you, Systolic, that it would not fit.Quote:
Originally Posted by timattalon
It is more, as @timattalon says, sloppiness. Maybe deliberate when it suits? A lot of very clever people hide behind fake poor use of the English language to mislead rather than outright lie.
As for motivation, the spirit of our time, the Zeitgeist, has it as the popular and "the done thing" for many (but not all) journalists to poop on gun owners.
