Police maintain the verbal policy, you are never under any circumstances, even under threat of death, allowed to use a firearm against another person.
The courts show another story. Many people have used firearms in self defense in NZ recently without being prosecuted or even liable. One gentleman in the horowhenua recently peppered three nomad gang members and their car with a shotgun. They claimed the younger brother owed money, can't pay, we want a turn on yer missus, usual story. They got buckshot instead. This was subject to media blackout because it aids the narrative, firearms are good defense against gang members. This makes Chris Cahill and the United Nations Disarmament Program sad.
If they are going to pursue one policy of never allowed guns for self defense, an even application of law is what I want. Let alone marking your territory and waving a gun around like a nut and shooting rounds over peoples heads.
I am personally advocating castle doctrine and concealed carry for NZ. This is my agenda. I dislike the inconsistent application of police policy and the law.
If that old guy was maori, he would be fucked. Look at the rotorua maori guy who may or may not have let one off at the police pinching his dope. How do you even hear a bullet sail by if you are flying a chopper? (unless it was tracers)
Bookmarks