Thread: Should this dropkick get his FAL back?

The cops gave, or had to give, that guy Jenner from Hamilton his licence back and had to pay $10 000 costs.

And he pleaded guilty selling guns to a gang member.

Why shouldn't someone who only lent one gun to a mate not get his back? It's up to the judge to decide. Not internet experts on here.
That's why we have judges to decide, not angry keyboard commandos.

Originally Posted by systolic

The cops gave, or had to give, that guy Jenner from Hamilton his licence back and had to pay $10 000 costs.

And he pleaded guilty selling guns to a gang member.

Why shouldn't someone who only lent one gun to a mate not get his back? It's up to the judge to decide. Not internet experts on here.
That's why we have judges to decide, not angry keyboard commandos.

Me thinks that many judges would do good to heed some direction from "keyboard commando's", as at the end of the day it is us that get restricted by the action of the "others", more than the "others."

The sentence for firearms offences should be taken out of the courts hands, if found guilty the sentence should be mandatory not up to some pussy judge there are to many judges handing out soft sentences
that have no deterrent effect on the offenders like the twat we are talking about.

Originally Posted by systolic

The cops gave, or had to give, that guy Jenner from Hamilton his licence back and had to pay $10 000 costs.

And he pleaded guilty selling guns to a gang member.

Why shouldn't someone who only lent one gun to a mate not get his back? It's up to the judge to decide. Not internet experts on here.
That's why we have judges to decide, not angry keyboard commandos.

Police did themselves no favours in their handling of Dale's case.

Originally Posted by systolic

The cops gave, or had to give, that guy Jenner from Hamilton his licence back and had to pay $10 000 costs.

And he pleaded guilty selling guns to a gang member.

Why shouldn't someone who only lent one gun to a mate not get his back? It's up to the judge to decide. Not internet experts on here.
That's why we have judges to decide, not angry keyboard commandos.

The opening post asked for our OPINIONS on if we thought he should get his licence back.

No