I see one difference between the chopper pilot and the reporter. And its a big one. The reporter set out to INTENTIONALLY break the law. It was deliberate act and she KNEW she was going to break the law when she did so. The Pilot did NOT go out with the intention of breaking the law. He was there in a guidance role and only made the decision to do what he did when he saw there could be fatal consequences if he did not.
SO
If a bloke who flew a helicopter while not currently licensed in a life and death rescue situation is not permitted to break the rules in that situation then no way in hell should a reporter allowed to break laws of a far more serious note without repercussions. (Fraud / forgery, and illegeally obtaining firearm and clearly her reason for obtaining a firearm was not for a legal purpose)
My thoughts.
Bookmarks