Looked in the mirror lately pensioner?Quote:
Originally Posted by Maca49
Printable View
Looked in the mirror lately pensioner?Quote:
Originally Posted by Maca49
TSK!!!!, TSK!!!!! Now now boys no need for nastiness eh???
This is just their pillow talk mate, they wont even notice we are listening :DQuote:
Originally Posted by top gun
[QUOTE=Rushy;430266]Looked in the mirror lately pensio
Get back on the carrots you old bugger, help your eye sight!!:ORLY:
Santa gave me a Swarovski spotting scope. There was note on it that is might come in handy when old coots tried to call shots:D
You should lend it to Maca then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody
So what's the latest on this topic - are the police prosecuting?
I received fairly trustworthy info yesterday from a source very close to the action in a certain Sth Island town that " the police ARE going to prosecute". How many of the arseholes & who exactly not divulged yet. The other question of course is WHEN are they going to have the hua's in court so we can all stick our knives in & give it a little/large twist!!!!!!??????????????
Let's not hold our breath waiting then.
There's a surprise.Quote:
Originally Posted by screamO
Not impressed at all!
All power to mr tipples prosecution then
The thing was done yo the "interest of the public", please what public other than "media havoc"???Quote:
Originally Posted by screamO
I (personally) don't have any interest in how to "bend" the law, actually, I think I could figure out it myself without any alarm reminding that law abiding citizens and gun owners don't need this kind of behaviour to purchase a gun.
Just my 0.02$c
There was no bending involved, she broke the law.
Poor decision on their behalf.
Don't bother going to the cops to sign your form, just fill that part in yourself, they won't charge you anyway.
/yawn
Yeh she was OK because she had no sinister purpose whereas us licensed (ie legit) firearm owners/purchasers must all therefore harbour sinister purposes obviously. I am not stressed by the decision as I had already decided (and posted my opinion) way back at the start of this thread that nothing would come of her actions. I did my huffing and puffing way back then. Huffing and puffing again is pointless as it only makes their victory more galling.
No................................... ReallyQuote:
Originally Posted by Tommy
Jeez Wayne!!! How wrong can someone be??? I should have relied on my instincts which said that certain people would put the"ARM" on the police NOT to proceed. Bugger me & I thought that our police force was NOT subjected to political interference??? Silly me.:pissed off:Quote:
Originally Posted by top gun
No ....... sarcasm.Quote:
Originally Posted by mikee
Pretty obvious they were going to wait till the outrage quietened down before announcing they'd let it slide. Think there would have been a bit too much embarrassment for themselves had they pursued it.
Typical!
I wonder if the police will let the new 2016 Arms Amendment bill slide too?? Uhh I don't think so.
Ya know, I might take advantage of these "journalistic privileges" myself. I've got my FAL but no E endorsement so I'll go buy a stack of 30 round mags and the compatible weapon they go with just to expose the "loopholes" all for the public interest of course.
I wonder how well that'll will go down. I will report back once I've handed in my illegal MSSA to the police so we can crack down on the outrageous gun laws in this country.
A slap in the face for all NZFAL holders!
i have a close contact high up in TV#mediaworks empire ,to whom i made my own and a few others sentiments very plain-the response "gets ratings though ,thats our gold".ratings so fucking beloved of MSM-the social concern utterances pure TV3 PR dept bullshit,
Bet me bottom dollar lil ol Heifer DPA& Duncy Garner are crackin the champers with associated newsroom cretins having put one up the man!
warning my arse -that'll just go in the boardroom trophy cabinet.
Soooo-where can we obtain a copy of the grounds for this decision ,so when some proper license holder "offends"the blue brigade ,he can produce it as part of his defence
the DUPLESSIS ALLEN precedent shall we call it.
lastly but more sinister is the thought that sooner or later some fucktard out there may well attempt to emulate these two and sadly suceed,again claiming but they did it and got off so thought Id try it!
Humans -the most intelligent of all the species-cases like this do give me grave doubts!
I cannot begin to say how fucking ridiculous that decision is. Frankly I despair for what has become of this country in the hands of overly politically corrected dickheads and do gooders. We may as well change the flag now because the current one stood for a far better country and a far better sense of justice than this country reflects today.
Like a cup of cold vomit I reckon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasquatch
So, what would a prosecution have actually achieved for gun owners? Someone please explain?
Happy to. For me a simple sense of satisfaction that a smart arsed bitch that thought she was immune from the law because she is a journalist, got her come uppance. No one should be above the law.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahr
You mean the decision to not prosecute someone for breaking the law, thus making it harder with more hoops to jump through, for people who DO obey the law? Amongst other thingsQuote:
Originally Posted by Tahr
And: IF you was a budding All Black candidate or potential world class sportsman you probably would be as safe as houses from being issued a new toothbrush & jammies for your stay in the pokie,eh??????:pacman:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasquatch
Quote:
Originally Posted by kotuku
Kotuku me old trout, I DO like the way you sling your words together!!!! Couldn't have put it better myself.
I have just sent Gun City the names of ALL the people ( six of the hua's) who should be on his lawyer brother's list of candidates for a private prosecution:yaeh am not durnk:
Gang-related shooting in Highbury | Stuff.co.nz
This knuckledragging scribbleface fuckwit obviously got his shooter via a boogie mail order form right? Or did he get it via that other highly used loophole - burglary? The gibbering media make me sick
aye tommy youve got that in a nutshell.
spot on me old china -get the whole internet and CHCH earthquake debris thrown at the pricks.Quote:
Originally Posted by top gun
There never was a loop hole, she broke the law to effect the purchase.
I'm with Rushy there is something fundamentally wrong with the legal system in NZ. There definitely an eleat class of citizen that have become immune to to force of the law. Drug use, violence, impersonation, etc all dropped or sentences lessened. It's not a good trend long term.
Wasn't Mediaworks bailed out with @50 mil of our money? The same Mediaworks that used to be(???) owned by minister of almost everything Steven Joyce?Quote:
Originally Posted by Maca49
He built it from scratch, and sold it in 2001Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve123
(ie 13 years before the bailout)
You mean I made my tinfoil hat for nothing?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy
Being paranoid doesn't necessarily mean that someone isn't out to get you ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve123
gentlemen -your common garden variety mammalian omnivore of the lesser species will generally react in a simple manner if you offend em-"youre dead .."and "whammo" so you are ,and generally your miserable remains are dined upon!
Humans on the other hand are the only species who ,make a rule ,to cover a rule ,to cover a rule ,to cover a rule to cover a rule relating to some smartarse who has pissed you or society off with their dickhead actions!ah say the erudite noteworthy academics and nobel prize winning thinkers ,but this is what places us so far ahead of our mammalian relatives,this is human evolution blah blah blah.obviously them bastards dont read this forum!!!
You can only possess a full auto on a C endorsement, and you can never fire it. However, if there's no "sinister intent", well gee whizz you're off scot-free now if you do, the police now don't prosecute that sort of thing. Now THERE'S a loophole eh?