Thread: unlawful hunting and having a firearm without a licence

Originally Posted by screamO

All I'm trying to say is there's always two sides of a story. Reporter's are very good at not telling the whole story.
As for pulp fiction, I don't think I ever made it through the whole movie.

FYI apart from closed hearings (this wasn't) transcripts from the Judiciary are public knowledge, so it's pretty tough for a reporter to hide the facts in this case. And that the hearing is open to the public, so that any member of the public can walk into the court room and observe the proceedings.

I'm just trying to figure out what you've said, that's all.

Originally Posted by screamO

Do you not think it's strange that a convicted poacher and illegal firearms criminal only got 90 hrs?

So the Judge is giving his friend a gentle sentence ?

Originally Posted by screamO

And I'm sure you guys have noticed how there's no mention of the "associate" that was also involved! Who just happened to be a licensed firearms user. Well fuck me, he still has his FAL and his firearms.

So the Police chose to not lay charges because they're friends or a big name in the area and didn't want to embarrass him ?

Originally Posted by screamO

Oh did I mention how the associate just happened to be the occupier of the.........sorry can't say anymore.

Associate is the occupier of the ... land ? Car ? Donkey ? Gimp club that the Judge frequents ? What ??

Originally Posted by screamO

If anybody tried to Google poaching in this area they might see a certain...........try and work t out.
Yes there's still more to it, there always is. Are we still all keen on hanging now?

So you're suggesting Michael Reedy, Dennis Long, Mike McDougal and Tony Tapper are working with the Police to keep the area just for themselves ? Including Karyn Malthus, Steve Greally, and a few others ?

I'm actually keen to try and figure out what you're saying that's all.