Just my opinion but the rules seem centred around possession, not ownership. I’m assuming that, as long as he doesn’t have the firearms in his personal possession for more than thirty days, you are still the Overlord. He can use them as he has an FAL, and come renewal time, it’ll be security that’s checked, not firearms and they are irrelevant because they’re registered already in your name. He’ll just have to register if he’s purchases any subsequent items or can transfer possession, if and when he wants/needs to. Only when you have registered a firearm in your name, then there is implied ownership and you are tied legally to that item.
Sorry, probably haven’t conveyed that very well but just think motor vehicles. Same thing happens. While motor vehicle registration doesn’t imply ownership, there are legal ramifications on whomever has their name on that document. I’m sure there are other hooks I haven’t thought of.
The rules are still being made up as they go along and it’s a dog’s breakfast which ever way you look at it but these what if’s are a great mental exercise, if nothing else.
Bookmarks