That was a fairly balanced article. In the first half the gun control lady is making up things to be concerned about that suits her personal agenda, and in the second half the police refute everything she said.
(As for the journalist she ( I assume shes a she) gets what she wants, by presenting the gun control lady's view first, which makes it sound like there is something dramatically bad going on, thereby getting the reader's attention. If there is anything unbalanced, it is certainly this - both the gun control lady and the journalist, want to present the reader with some Bad News About Guns. But as far as these things go, this article is about as good as it gets nowadays I am afraid.)
Bookmarks