Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

ZeroPak DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33
Like Tree62Likes

Thread: Why do hunters continue to be accidentally shot?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    310

    Why do hunters continue to be accidentally shot?

    Cognitive bias - If you can ignore the fact the authors of this may have their own bias the attached report offers the best insight into why these deaths still occur and why they probably will continue to:

    http://www.huntersafetylab.com/wp-co...rs-review1.pdf

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Timaru
    Posts
    152
    Can't be accidents More like negligence from the shooter

    Antz
    P38, mikee, Pengy and 2 others like this.

  3. #3
    Member peril 787b's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    325
    People being too comfortable in the fact they'd never get it wrong? Insufficient training?
    Hennie260 likes this.

  4. #4
    P38
    P38 is offline
    Member P38's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    5,692
    Could only be two possible answers to your question @Mike H

    Negligence = Failure to "Positively Identify Your Target".

    Deliberate Intent = 'Target Was Positively Identified".

    Cheers
    Pete
    mikee, deer243, northdude and 2 others like this.

  5. #5
    Member oneshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    934
    Its pretty easy to point the finger and speculate at these tragic events. There is a shitload more people hunting even from when I first started years ago ( and Im not old ) To many people eager to bag something instead of thinking about safety first.
    Munsey likes this.
    Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    310
    Quote Originally Posted by oneshot View Post
    Its pretty easy to point the finger and speculate at these tragic events. There is a shitload more people hunting even from when I first started years ago ( and Im not old ) To many people eager to bag something instead of thinking about safety first.
    That may be the case but since 1979 there's been on average one hunting fatality every 9 months. This is not just a recent occurrence.

  7. #7
    northdude
    Guest
    i recon its because theres hunters and shooters some people just want to shoot something where a hunter has a specific target in mind and only shoots that target

  8. #8
    ebf
    ebf is offline
    Mushroom juice ! Hic ! ebf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Above the Hutt
    Posts
    6,872
    Quote Originally Posted by northdude View Post
    i recon its because theres hunters and shooters some people just want to shoot something where a hunter has a specific target in mind and only shoots that target
    You can be a "shooter" without ever hunting. Lots of people involved in shooting sport on target ranges that never hunt... This is a hunting issue. The only sector in the NZ shooting community where this type of thing happens regular like clockwork is amongst hunters.

    It is not a Firearms Licencing issue, it is not a shooting issue... It is a HUNTING issue, and it needs to be addressed as such.
    Viva la Howa ! R.I.P. Toby | Black rifles matter... | #illegitimate_ute

  9. #9
    northdude
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ebf View Post
    You can be a "shooter" without ever hunting. Lots of people involved in shooting sport on target ranges that never hunt... This is a hunting issue. The only sector in the NZ shooting community where this type of thing happens regular like clockwork is amongst hunters.

    It is not a Firearms Licencing issue, it is not a shooting issue... It is a HUNTING issue, and it needs to be addressed as such.
    i was meaning when hunting you dont hear of target shooters shooting each other

  10. #10
    ebf
    ebf is offline
    Mushroom juice ! Hic ! ebf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Above the Hutt
    Posts
    6,872
    What's that old saying ?

    Definition of insanity : doing the same thing and expecting a different result....
    199p and northdude like this.
    Viva la Howa ! R.I.P. Toby | Black rifles matter... | #illegitimate_ute

  11. #11
    GSP Mad Munsey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    5,237
    Interesting Reading . A point that doesn't get mentioned is the pressure to shoot an anamil . As in fly in hunters paying $600 plus and felling the need to come home with a deer , or a internet hunter talked it up for two three weeks ..... or the president of the deer stalkers needing to live up to expectations ? .
    nevereadyfreddy and Blisters like this.
    Rule 7: Avoid alcohol and drugs when handling firearms

  12. #12
    Member stretch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Clarks Beach, (South of) Auckland
    Posts
    1,738
    What sort of distance are these incidents occurring at? We're talking 10's of meters, right? This technical solution might've worked, but it relies on widespread adoption, and once you put active safety measures in place, you run the risk of getting the opposite result, where a hunter thinks "well my gadget / balloted permit says there's no other hunters in the area, so what I'm seeing must not be human."

    Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

  13. #13
    Member Reindeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Wanganui no H
    Posts
    491
    Whatever it is,speculation without the facts is really just that. However we,as a group, seem to be faced wit this type of event year on year with awfully similar circumstance leading to our speculated (educated guess) result.
    Whats the answer, blowed if i know, all i know is i have spent many hours,days,weeks in and out of the bush and more often than not empty handed.
    Now that's not to say i haven't seen animals or I'm a shit hunter what I'm saying is i have always taken the time to really watch my quarry and decide if, in fact, this is the animal i want or, lets face it, I've blown the shot.

    I have watched some really good vids on you tube and in turn i have seen some bloody terrible vids. Some really bad firearms handling and attitudes are displayed and when you mention this to them they get really quite defensive or block/turn off comments. Are these the source of increased hunter numbers? I'm not convinced. What I can say is the younger (<25) guys aren't the ones that turn up to range days or interested in disciplined shooting (in our club).
    Im with @ebf on this one, this is a hunting issue and as a group (hunters) we need to take ownership of it and make steps to preventing the yearly recurrence. Now before you get up me and say "I'm good, i know my shit" that may not stop you from being shot/at yourself.

    It seems there's no simple answers just devastated families and a nervous hunting fraternity.
    Sideshow likes this.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    West Auckland
    Posts
    1,131
    These are not "accidental" shootings, they are "unintentional". Calling them accidental makes them seem unavoidable. These are all preventable.
    Micky Duck likes this.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Quakechurch
    Posts
    1,756
    These are not "accidental" shootings, they are "unintentional". Calling them accidental makes them seem unavoidable. These are all preventable.
    If you are going to argue about semantics to fit your world view you should try to be more precise. They are an intentional shooting in error with an accidental outcome. Accidents can be avoided, but not without the cost of the elimination of the activity.

    Like it or not, there will always be a statistical error rate. Ever heard the saying "nobody's perfect?"

    That is not to say that we shouldn't be trying to reduce the error rate and its catastrophic effects....

    The biggest impediment to this issue in my opinion is the constant repetitive thoughtless mantra "he failed to identify his target"..... its a bit like saying "going faster is more dangerous" equally as useless...

    The right question is "Why did he fail to successfully identify his target"?

    Until we understand the reasons why he failed, we will not make progress at reducing these incidents... and the lock em up forever brigade are just sacrificing another victim as a selfish emotional response....

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Lawyer accidentally takes pistol to court
    By Tommy in forum Firearm Safety
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-07-2015, 10:36 AM
  2. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 08-04-2015, 02:29 PM
  3. To continue my education on AR15s 223 chamber v 5.56mm
    By steven in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 29-07-2014, 09:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!