Thread: Why frontline cops should be armed

Originally Posted by MassiveAttack

So basically what you are saying is that while she might face risks they are not that bad and she doesn't need a gun. Given that people she works with were on a hit list of a bloke who actually went on a murderious rampage I respectfully disagree.

You can't say you are neutral on self defence (for non police) and they say you don't know if the risks outweigh the benefits. Those two statements contradict.

I don't have any stats but you are forgetting the accidental discharge in the old Chch central police station. My info came from the instructor when I did the RO certification course. Civilian rifle ranges used to have a perfect safty record but there was an injury at a pistol range in recent years. As that was discussed the police officers in attendance said that there have been many injuries\incidents at police ranges so thats where I got my info from.

The WINZ incident was committed by a lone person with mental health issues, it's a one off or extremely rare, not a daily occurrence. Who got called in to deal with that guy? Police.

Because I don't know is exactly why I'm neutral, there is no contradiction in that statement.

You stated "if you look at the safety statistics", now you're saying you don't know the statistics, that gives me great confidence in what you post.

I wasn't forgetting anything, I never heard of the CHCH incident, are you saying there has never been an accidental discharge on a civilian range? I talk to a lot of cops and don't hear of many injuries and incidents.