Thread: Words Fail me

Originally Posted by Hermitage

He should watch his 'throwaway remarks' when it comes to harming someone... esp if it involves firearms.

Heck just making your fingers into a pistol and 'aiming' it at someone is enough to lose your firearms license.

My informant did not specify the nature of his remarks nor did i ask ,so please kindly refrain from jumping to conclusions as to their content . THANK YOU.
As to the other,it was quite clearly started in the MSM article that those people had been arguing with assorted legal agencies for quite some time before the fingerpointing incident occurred so that does give some proper context.

Originally Posted by kotuku

My informant did not specify the nature of his remarks nor did i ask ,so please kindly refrain from jumping to conclusions as to their content . THANK YOU.
As to the other,it was quite clearly started in the MSM article that those people had been arguing with assorted legal agencies for quite some time before the fingerpointing incident occurred so that does give some proper context.

The point I was making is that times have changed a lot since the ChCh shooting.
Hell times have changed with Firearms a huge amount since 'the NZ our fathers fought and died for'.
Firearms are not something the average citizen understands anymore and basically, they don't want to know. They just know they are 'dangerous'.

All licensed Firearm owners have to be very careful with their words and actions these days if they don't want the possibility of losing their license.

Originally Posted by Hermitage

The point I was making is that times have changed a lot since the ChCh shooting.
Hell times have changed with Firearms a huge amount since 'the NZ our fathers fought and died for'.
Firearms are not something the average citizen understands anymore and basically, they don't want to know. They just know they are 'dangerous'.

All licensed Firearm owners have to be very careful with their words and actions these days if they don't want the possibility of losing their license.

the point you were making has been bloody obvious since these genetically engineered dollops of DNA first got their little tertiary educated paws on the reins of power.Given my half century of frontline mental health work Im fully cognisant of the foibles of human nature so dont need repititious reminders thanks all the same.Ive said all along if this incoming debacle and police powers associated with it ever went before a court of law(a distinct possiblity not probability) and the decision was in favour of the petitioner NZ police could end up with a lot more than egg on their faces and they know it .The IPCA and police union head have already alluded to misgivings re police activities in recent times.It appaers that the rationale used here tend more toward the intended censorship of speech on the face of it.

Originally Posted by kotuku

My informant did not specify the nature of his remarks nor did i ask ,so please kindly refrain from jumping to conclusions as to their content . THANK YOU.
As to the other,it was quite clearly started in the MSM article that those people had been arguing with assorted legal agencies for quite some time before the fingerpointing incident occurred so that does give some proper context.

My apologies if I've read this wrong Kotuku, but in your own words, you "don't know the specifics of the nature of his remarks", and "nor did you ask him"
Two sides to every story I'm really saying, until the specifics are correlated. And that's where the Police come in.