Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT ZeroPak


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 33
Like Tree52Likes

Thread: Kennel vs private

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    5,462
    Heading dogs are tough bastards and high health. Pedigree dog breeds carry and inbreeding coefficient of around 60% ( this is a mathematical ratio for calculating the closeness of breeding) where no more than 20% is desirable. So what this means is that it is very hard to get away from the genetic faults that a breed has even with culling. Crossbreeding with a fault free breed - (heading dog) fixes it in a single stroke.
    Interestingly, Greyhounds are free of genetic faults.
    I have always though a GWP would be a great base for a cross with all sorts
    Brakelie and Micky Duck like this.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    974
    Quote Originally Posted by Moa Hunter View Post
    Heading dogs are tough bastards and high health. Pedigree dog breeds carry and inbreeding coefficient of around 60% ( this is a mathematical ratio for calculating the closeness of breeding) where no more than 20% is desirable. So what this means is that it is very hard to get away from the genetic faults that a breed has even with culling. Crossbreeding with a fault free breed - (heading dog) fixes it in a single stroke.
    Interestingly, Greyhounds are free of genetic faults.
    I have always though a GWP would be a great base for a cross with all sorts
    Ok I’ll bite... ya buck toothed registered purebred will by default be around 12.5 coe ... that’s a close invercargil mating
    The desired outcome most aim for is below 10 over 10 generations ... way off your actual quote of 60 which would not compute let alone get paperwork.
    Going by Mickys road trip with crossbreds your fault free breed fixit don’t work as well, heading dogs go blind and deaf with the best of them... most have a line bred element as well.
    Greyhounds,cheetahs and wolves all have high coe ... a lot of the best Gundog breeds do as well with no horror stories.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North Canterbury
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by kawhia View Post
    Ok I’ll bite... ya buck toothed registered purebred will by default be around 12.5 coe ... that’s a close invercargil mating
    The desired outcome most aim for is below 10 over 10 generations ... way off your actual quote of 60 which would not compute let alone get paperwork.
    Going by Mickys road trip with crossbreds your fault free breed fixit don’t work as well, heading dogs go blind and deaf with the best of them... most have a line bred element as well.
    Greyhounds,cheetahs and wolves all have high coe ... a lot of the best Gundog breeds do as well with no horror stories.
    Ok, so as we move forward in generations the coefficient decreases but the issue remains that on average first generations of most pedigree breeds were 60% inbred. With such a close base (low diversity) it makes it very difficult IMO to get rid of faults without getting rid of the entire strain. Dogs as diverse as Pugs, Dachshunds, Saint Bernards and Great danes as examples all come from the same original wild dogs. It is close inbreeding of certain individuals that has produced these divergent shapes and sizes.
    What this means is that in some breeds it is virtually impossible to find an individual free of a major fault. Crossing to an unrelated breed doesnt make the fault disappear from the genes, but it masks it for that generation which will be good sound utility dogs

    @7x64 really knows about this stuff

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    974
    Quote Originally Posted by Moa Hunter View Post
    Ok, so as we move forward in generations the coefficient decreases but the issue remains that on average first generations of most pedigree breeds were 60% inbred. With such a close base (low diversity) it makes it very difficult IMO to get rid of faults without getting rid of the entire strain. Dogs as diverse as Pugs, Dachshunds, Saint Bernards and Great danes as examples all come from the same original wild dogs. It is close inbreeding of certain individuals that has produced these divergent shapes and sizes.
    What this means is that in some breeds it is virtually impossible to find an individual free of a major fault. Crossing to an unrelated breed doesnt make the fault disappear from the genes, but it masks it for that generation which will be good sound utility dogs

    @7x64 really knows about this stuff
    So you are saying first cross dogs are free of any health issues

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!