MD seems to have had a tiff with the mods. Maybe things got said by pm. He won’t be permanently banned, it’ll be a few days or a week. I’m sure everyone will settle down soo enough. Anyway Gibo...
Liked On: 20-12-2023, 01:28 PM
MD seems to have had a tiff with the mods. Maybe things got said by pm. He won’t be permanently banned, it’ll be a few days or a week. I’m sure everyone will settle down soo enough. Anyway Gibo...
Liked On: 19-12-2023, 08:34 PM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 16-12-2023, 04:48 PM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 16-12-2023, 12:18 PM
I've been reading a fair bit about this today and it's been very interesting indeed. It's also interesting reading some of the comments. If you go through a blow-by-blow account of the project,...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 05:59 PM
I've been reading a fair bit about this today and it's been very interesting indeed. It's also interesting reading some of the comments. If you go through a blow-by-blow account of the project,...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 05:32 PM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 01:29 PM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 12:36 PM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 11:41 AM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 11:18 AM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 11:05 AM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 10:29 AM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 10:28 AM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 10:14 AM
My take on this situation is that this is simply Luxon applying some standard “Executive Chairman” principles to an out of control subsidiary, i.e. this isn’t good enough, so stop, go back to first...
Liked On: 15-12-2023, 10:14 AM