Although, you also have to remember that that square relationship between energy and velocity works back in your favour downrange when you bullet impacts... A bullet going 2x faster is going to...
Liked On: 22-06-2023, 08:03 AM
You have to remember that energy is proportional to the square of velocity so it takes 4x as much energy to generate 2x the velocity. Powder is a form of stored energy (in the chemical bonds). Plus...
Liked On: 21-06-2023, 06:26 AM
Although, you also have to remember that that square relationship between energy and velocity works back in your favour downrange when you bullet impacts... A bullet going 2x faster is going to...
Liked On: 21-06-2023, 06:25 AM
You have to remember that energy is proportional to the square of velocity so it takes 4x as much energy to generate 2x the velocity. Powder is a form of stored energy (in the chemical bonds). Plus...
Liked On: 21-06-2023, 06:25 AM
Although, you also have to remember that that square relationship between energy and velocity works back in your favour downrange when you bullet impacts... A bullet going 2x faster is going to...
Liked On: 21-06-2023, 06:25 AM
Although, you also have to remember that that square relationship between energy and velocity works back in your favour downrange when you bullet impacts... A bullet going 2x faster is going to...
Liked On: 20-06-2023, 11:30 PM
You have to remember that energy is proportional to the square of velocity so it takes 4x as much energy to generate 2x the velocity. Powder is a form of stored energy (in the chemical bonds). Plus...
Liked On: 20-06-2023, 11:30 PM
Although, you also have to remember that that square relationship between energy and velocity works back in your favour downrange when you bullet impacts... A bullet going 2x faster is going to...
Liked On: 20-06-2023, 10:32 PM
To me it just sounds like you're way over pressure in your 6.5CM loads. I haven't seen any published data that says it can achieve anywhere near that velocity. Consider also that the way 6.5CM...
Liked On: 18-06-2023, 05:38 PM
To me it just sounds like you're way over pressure in your 6.5CM loads. I haven't seen any published data that says it can achieve anywhere near that velocity. Consider also that the way 6.5CM...
Liked On: 18-06-2023, 03:51 PM
To me it just sounds like you're way over pressure in your 6.5CM loads. I haven't seen any published data that says it can achieve anywhere near that velocity. Consider also that the way 6.5CM...
Liked On: 18-06-2023, 01:30 PM
Think I'll try 25.2, 25.5 (which most people seem to be having success with) and 25.8 (what the rifle currently likes with the Sierra's) of 2206HakaH4895 behind the 69gr Targex this weekend and see...
Liked On: 12-06-2023, 08:32 PM
Great info! Seems like confirmation that that 19" mark is looking pretty good... With the variability, I would say they didn't show any appreciable dropoff till they went below 18"
Liked On: 10-06-2023, 06:38 PM
Think I'll try 25.2, 25.5 (which most people seem to be having success with) and 25.8 (what the rifle currently likes with the Sierra's) of 2206HakaH4895 behind the 69gr Targex this weekend and see...
Liked On: 10-06-2023, 03:03 PM
I think you know one of my other best mates also haha
Liked On: 10-06-2023, 01:44 PM