Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Ammo Direct Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25
Like Tree23Likes

Thread: 110 vs 130gr TTSX

  1. #16
    sneakywaza I got
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Fairlie
    Posts
    3,586
    Quote Originally Posted by TeRei View Post
    Use 2213sc on 110.
    2213 in .308? 2208 will be useable, but 2206H or H335 would be better. Bullets kill by tearing apart vital tissue destroying pneumatics, hydraulics and electrics, running Targex 165 Hp in my .308. Short barrel and unable to run an Hp solid fast enough to do anything other than bore a caliber sized hole through an animal past 200yds. TTX and TTSX need speed and plenty of it, I don't like them under 2600fps or so impact.
    6x47 likes this.

  2. #17
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,968
    2208 will be too slow to get the best out of the 110s.

    I was over 51grns with the 130 and it is real tricky to get more than that in and very compressed load.

    2206h or h335 will be much better.
    Gibo and 6x47 like this.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  3. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Nz
    Posts
    3,005
    Quote Originally Posted by 257weatherby View Post
    2213 in .308? 2208 will be useable, but 2206H or H335 would be better. Bullets kill by tearing apart vital tissue destroying pneumatics, hydraulics and electrics, running Targex 165 Hp in my .308. Short barrel and unable to run an Hp solid fast enough to do anything other than bore a caliber sized hole through an animal past 200yds. TTX and TTSX need speed and plenty of it, I don't like them under 2600fps or so impact.
    Based on 2950 for the 130s and 3100 for the 110s basically 2600fps impact speed means they are good for less than 150yds. Really does make them.bush rounds aye
    Micky Duck likes this.

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Nz
    Posts
    3,005
    Quote Originally Posted by veitnamcam View Post
    2208 will be too slow to get the best out of the 110s.

    I was over 51grns with the 130 and it is real tricky to get more than that in and very compressed load.

    2206h or h335 will be much better.
    Think I know where some h335 is so will check and go from there

  5. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Wanganui
    Posts
    3,250
    And their pretty pricey the game kings are epic

  6. #21
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,968
    Quote Originally Posted by superdiver View Post
    Based on 2950 for the 130s and 3100 for the 110s basically 2600fps impact speed means they are good for less than 150yds. Really does make them.bush rounds aye
    You should be up round 3100-3200fps with the 130 if using a suitable powder in a 20-22" barrel.....110s should be faster but may not extend the effective range.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  7. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Nz
    Posts
    3,005
    Quote Originally Posted by Kelton View Post
    And their pretty pricey the game kings are epic
    Haha well aware they are stupidly expensive just never tried them in any rifle I have ever and keen to

  8. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Wanganui
    Posts
    3,250
    Quote Originally Posted by superdiver View Post
    Haha well aware they are stupidly expensive just never tried them in any rifle I have ever and keen to

    100% understand the need to tinker do tell as I am wanting to throw some down the 7mm for shit and gigs I gave them a very very quick uneducated look in .308 long ago cant remember the weight but I never chased the load after initial few shots the lightest I can find for 30cal at the moment is 168ish weight range to big for my little gun

  9. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    733
    Name:  IMG_20210614_081805_454351020164002.jpg
Views: 142
Size:  354.4 KB

    I bought a sako 308 20 inch barrel years ago, and it came with a pile if these. I purely used them as a Bush load at about 2900fps and I had the best results I've had out of any projectile in regards to instant kills. Personally I rate them for this sort of work but never tried them out beyond about 100m.

    The projectile above was a 130grn ttsx found under the skin on opposite shoulder of a sika stag.
    superdiver, takbok and stagstalker like this.

  10. #25
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    1,887
    I have àn unopened box of 130 TTSX bought about seven years ago that I'd sell for $75 delivered. Never did get around to trying them.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for 168gr 30cal ELD-M - have 130gr ttsx
    By sambnz in forum Projectile and Factory Ammo Exchange
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22-07-2018, 05:15 PM
  2. Barnes .308 130gr ttsx
    By MSL in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08-03-2018, 11:36 AM
  3. looking for 30cal 130gr ttsx
    By dale in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 13-09-2014, 11:18 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!