2209 and no because i do all my load development starting in to the lands
as if it don't work out there is only one way go and thats back off , so far
my 223 is the only rifle that don't like it touching .![]()
2209 and no because i do all my load development starting in to the lands
as if it don't work out there is only one way go and thats back off , so far
my 223 is the only rifle that don't like it touching .![]()
R19 for me in 260. Very nice.
Dan M
Still early days but got higher speed than 2209 before pressure
Have just got some super primacy to try.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Start around 45grns and you will be close with superperformance I reckon.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.
Cool thanks ill start there and see how it goes.
Sorry for late reply. With the 140VLD-H and with a Superformance powder load of 46.9gn I'm getting about 2830F/S.
Obviously this load is for my rifle and starting several grains less for your tests would be sensible.
Good Luck
What are peoples optimal oal length in this cal? Eg how does it go
In a rem short action with the 140's seated out?
And further to that, in a 20inch tube what is a realistic MV between the .260 and AI version using 143gr (yeah, yeah I know) projectiles.
Is the increase substantial?
I'd say no even though I haven't had a 260 Ai, in a 20" mine's pushing 2700 with the 140 without pressures. Anaemic I know but I'm a barrel life and accuracy guy so I'm never going to be the person who's chasing 3000 in a 6.5 with 140's.
Dan M
Bookmarks