They are all good, but the idea that the military always gets the best stuff is not quite correct. Often cost, nationality of the manufacturer, legal considerations and marketing play a bigger part than how good the kit is. Perhaps 6.5 Creedmoor was selected because it’s made by an American company which is also the biggest ammunition supplier so can guarantee supply in the quantities required. Hornady also has a great marketing department.
Even if 6.5x47 was better, it was never going be selected over Creedmoor. I don’t have a dog in the fight, but don’t believe that because the US Army selects something that it must automatically be the best.
Bookmarks