I believe it's the combinations of bullet-length,plus rpm's (8-twist), and BC/SD, that make the 6.5's so efficient at the lower FPS. It appears to be one of the few calibers that gets everything right. With the 6.5x55, it was second only to 9mm parabellum, in having the highest no. of ballistics-experts, involved in its development.
Not sure, but isn't that the whole point with Hydrostatic shock? Nothing dies instantly unless you smack it in the head, even then it's brain dead but the heart is still pumping for a little while? I guess making a mess inside and still having the animal move would increase bleed out?
The instant knockdown is preferable anyway and most animals that get hit that hard in the boiler room and get up don't make it far from my experience so I'm not sure if he's saying it's a good thing or bad?
Last edited by SlimySquirrel; 29-05-2019 at 01:39 PM.
Same! I know you weren't questioning, I'm intrigued by the idea too.
It's often seen on Rabbits with the little 17's. First time I shot one with an Hm2 it looked like it was being electrocuted. I have a video of a large billy shot with 7mm08 at 220 yds 129 sst and it did the same. Literally just stiffened up and died. Wonder what sized/speed calibre would be required for Reds in comparison.
Banged a quick video together for an example.
You can see them stiffen up then start to move a few seconds later as the shock passes through.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Qs7RbKbuZ0
@Gibo Varied between 10m to 150m, only one that didn’t exit was a big stag at 150m.
Shut up, get out & start pushing!
@outdoorlad, how would you characterise the shot replacement on your five deer with the 6.5 mm SST? Where they roughly the same?
Was there a common point of impact and angle of pass through? Can you describe it like "front line of foreleg" or "in the crease" or "behind the shoulder", that kind of thing?
For normal hunting ranges, I'm 100% convinced that where you hit them in the boiler room, and with what, has more influence on whether or not they go down fast, than calibre and speed. Take an old school .30-30 and a slow flat point, and a .243 and a fast soft-point spitzer, and you can do exactly the same thing to a deer with a certain type of boiler room shot.
@Mooseman's large sambar the other day was a perfect example of the Swede doing the bizzo yet in some countries these days it seems the Swede is regarded as "not enough gun" for their poxy tiddler deer!
Just...say...the...word
To answer your question @Gibo here is the link https://www.ballisticstudies.com/Kno...e+Killing.html
There is quite a lot to humane game killing, I have shot Roe deer in Saxony with a 30 06 and 180 grn pills and they all ran. Big hole plenty of damage but no instant collapse. Wonder what would have happened if I was using a 2250 or 243 with light high velocity bullets that can better shed energy.
All bar one were in the shoulder region and normally I go for the foreleg area to break bone, two however were angled, one stag facing me on an angle in the bush, hit thru the shoulder and exited mid ribs. The other was a yearling angling slightly away, behind the shoulder and out thru the offside shoulder.
I guess the point I was trying to make was that the 129SST seems to preform very well at a slow to moderate speed, a friend tried the 130gn sst in his 270 years ago and hated them as they expanded to quickly and didn’t penetrate at the high speed they were going.
Shut up, get out & start pushing!
And its a point I agree with 100% @outdoorlad. Often we see or hear about guys unhappy with bullet performance, and a frequent common denominator is a fast cartridge with a soft-ish bullet.
Seems to me that a lot of the common cup-and-core hunting bullets are at their performance limits around 2500-2600fps impact velocity, so say 2700-2800fps muzzle velocity. Poor penetration and excessive fragmentation are complaints about the SST all over the world. But how many of these complaints are from 7mm Rem Mags, 270s, 6.5-284s, etc etc?
Who knows, just seems to me that the complaints about Hornady SST, Sierra GameKing, Nosler Ballistic Tips etc often concern close range impacts from 3000fps+ cartridges. That additional 10% MV seems to make a lot of difference. We had a similar concern on here recently with ELD-X out of 7mm Rem Mags.
My one cuz used a new CZ 6.5 Grendel last season with (I think) the same weight SST in factory ammo, and loved it. Mule deer. In the front of the fuse box, all over rover.
Just...say...the...word
I use the 6.5G with 123gr SST MV 2430ish and it's truly devastating when I shot a couple of big billies at about 80m side on square shoulder, exit wound was large. I'm not changing from them as I think they work well in this cartridges speed (I think the 123gr may have been developed for the 6.5G)
Bookmarks