Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 40 of 40
Like Tree36Likes

Thread: Ballistic truing conundrum

  1. #31
    Member chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,810
    Yep, checking (again) the zero is next on the list. Should get that next weekend if weather plays ball.

  2. #32
    Member chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,810
    SAUM 162 ELDM RL26 scope DOPE update
    An update on previous posts, chasing down a difference of +1moa at 625 yards. Ballistic solvers predicted a 10moa come up, compared to my dialed come up of 9moa which gave a variance of 1-1.5in POI (low) vs POA. This set me re-checking some of the basics
    1. Scope (VX6) dial up calibration. Turns out it’s dialing 1.083 in/moa, a 3% error. This equates very closely to 0.25moa at 625 yds
    2. POI vs POA, checking measurements again and confirmed 1-1.5 in low at 625yd. This also equates to ~0.25 moa at 625yds. 



    Correcting for 1&2 above my dial up should have been 9.25 moa and that equates to 9.5moa once you factor in the scope cal. This leaves an “error” of 0.5 moa to account for.


    3. Re-check 200 yd zero, equates to 1.3in high at 100. Went to range this past weekend & put 5 shots down range. Average of 5 gave 1.5in high at 100. This equates to zero of 210 yards.

    So correcting for all 3 above I still need to DOPE the muzzle velocity to get 9.5moa answer from solver. Adjusting speed to 3020fps (vs 2995fps measured) with a 210yd zero does the trick.

    I also ran calcs using no adjustment for zero, just tweaking velocity (needs 3050 fps) to get 9.5 moa at 625yd. And another set just tweaking zero (needs 220 yd zero) leaving speed at 2995fps. However all 3 versions are less than 0.25 moa difference from 350 yards all the way out to 900, which is further than anything I’d attempt on game.
    So I’ll proceed using 3020fps for muzzle velocity, 210 yd zero and adjusting the come up to account for scope dialing more than true moa.
    Job done.
    gqhoon, rossi.45 and charliehorse like this.

  3. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Timaru
    Posts
    966
    does your solver allow for scope correction?
    for your 200yard zero why not just shoot at 200m and zero there?

  4. #34
    Member chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    CNI
    Posts
    5,810
    Kestrel 5700 I think does have an option to input scope correction factor. But I’ve not played around with that feature as yet. Actually it’s pretty easy run the math in your head. 500 - 700 yards it’s reduce come up by 0.25 moa. Then 750 - 900 it’s reduce by 0.5 moa. Won’t be shooting any further than that & sub 500 it’s less than 1/4moa so you can’t dial it anyways.
    Metres vs yards. Yeah, nah. My brain is wired in yards, feet, inches & moa.

  5. #35
    Member andyanimal31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Makakahi road Raetihi
    Posts
    3,710
    Quote Originally Posted by chainsaw View Post
    Kestrel 5700 I think does have an option to input scope correction factor. But I’ve not played around with that feature as yet. Actually it’s pretty easy run the math in your head. 500 - 700 yards it’s reduce come up by 0.25 moa. Then 750 - 900 it’s reduce by 0.5 moa. Won’t be shooting any further than that & sub 500 it’s less than 1/4moa so you can’t dial it anyways.
    Metres vs yards. Yeah, nah. My brain is wired in yards, feet, inches & moa.
    If you have nightforce you don't need that bit!

    Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk
    My favorite sentences i like to hear are - I suppose so. and Send It!

  6. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Timaru
    Posts
    966
    not true. kahles had been tested as the most accurate dialing.

  7. #37
    Member andyanimal31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Makakahi road Raetihi
    Posts
    3,710
    Quote Originally Posted by blair993 View Post
    not true. kahles had been tested as the most accurate dialing.
    You can't bang six inch spikes in with a kahles.
    To be fair nf has been the bench mark for modern optics and accurate dialing for years.
    A lot of manufactures are now catching up that is a fact.
    I support nf as they are a family owned southern hemisphere business that produces some of the toughest and most accurate optics in the world.

    Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk
    My favorite sentences i like to hear are - I suppose so. and Send It!

  8. #38
    Member zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    4,986
    Or take a 7.62x39 sideways thru the ocular and still keep functioning until the marine returned to base to get it replaced.

    Sure they started out as Liteforce and still have an Adelaide address but I see NF as an American company now.
    Oh, and I own their scopes as well, only humble NXSs though.

    Recall the vid where a I guy shot a very respectable group with a NF scope . Fired a shot, removed scope from QD mounts, threw it as hard as he could down range, retrieved, re-attached, fired next shot, and so on.

  9. #39
    Member andyanimal31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Makakahi road Raetihi
    Posts
    3,710
    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    Or take a 7.62x39 sideways thru the ocular and still keep functioning until the marine returned to base to get it replaced.

    Sure they started out as Liteforce and still have an Adelaide address but I see NF as an American company now.
    Oh, and I own their scopes as well, only humble NXSs though.

    Recall the vid where a I guy shot a very respectable group with a NF scope . Fired a shot, removed scope from QD mounts, threw it as hard as he could down range, retrieved, re-attached, fired next shot, and so on.
    Night force Australia has a subsidiary company USA.
    The family that own and run it are very much aussie based with a couple of trips a year to Idaho.
    They still do quit a bit of product development there in Aussie to as a very shooting oriented family.


    Sent from my SM-A226B using Tapatalk
    zimmer likes this.
    My favorite sentences i like to hear are - I suppose so. and Send It!

  10. #40
    Member SPEARONZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Nth island
    Posts
    402
    Even if it doesn't solve your problem go and shoot at 200yards! Don't trust the math of 1.3 high at 100.

    Theres something about that distance. My DOPE from applied ballistics is always slightly out at 200m even when I've validated much further out.
    dannyb likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Truing a Ballistic Calculator
    By Tentman in forum Shooting
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-12-2020, 02:57 PM
  2. A conundrum
    By Marty Henry in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 21-10-2020, 12:12 PM
  3. Truing up an oil stone
    By Pengy in forum Gear and Equipment
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 22-08-2019, 05:35 PM
  4. Remington 700 Action Truing/Blueprinting
    By C.T. in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 26-08-2016, 12:02 AM
  5. Just some truing videos and pics
    By robhughes-games in forum Projects and Home Builds
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 20-08-2016, 10:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!