I have a rifle that doesn't group well or consistently. At this point I'd like to thank R93 , Jit and others that have helped with their advise. It's a 7rem mag with a 1 in 9.5 twist and this is where I believe the problem lies. I have wanted to use 162sst's and the like but they group terrible. I spent a lot of time trying all sorts of things with powder, seating depths etc but not until I had used 162 eldx's, 168 berger classics, amax's have I come to a conclusion based on a bit of measuring. To start with I believe I have a finicky barrel. I also believe 9.5 twist is boarder line for those heavier projectiles. Some rifles with this twist work and some don't. Reading stability tables it seems the longer the projectile the faster the twist needed or words to that affect. This got me thinking on which shot the best in my rifle so out came the verniers and hornady comparator. In order of accuracy it would go ;sierra tmk 3/4 inch, 168 berger 3/4-1 ,amax 1-1.5inch, eldx 1.5-2 inch, sst 1.5-3.00inch. Groups are usually consistant for each bullet just some days I shoot a bit better but the averages are the same. The tighter projectiles usually have two very close and one away to open up a group. I've had the barrel measured and checked as well. What I found tonight was interesting and sort of makes sense. I had a feeling bearing length might have something to do with it as much or more than length. I put the comparator on the vernier and measured the ogive length and the turned the bullet and placed the boat tail end in and measured that distance , then subtracted one from the other to get a bearing length and also measured the entire projectile. this is what I got;
Sierra tmk 160 oal 1.430 bearing .444
berger 168 classic 1.393 .347
amax 162 1.426 .524
eldx 162 1.475 .502
sst 162 1.394 .515
These are measurements from the boxes of projectiles I have and averaged over several from each box. You'll notice that the least bearing the better accuracy I get and that length seems to be a lessor factor. Those of you will notice the amax is out of place but I beleave that they have changed and my first shooting was probably done using the earlier ones which did shoot better than the boxes I have now. I got them off a friend who'd had them for years and the boxes were different and I understand there was a change to them at least once in their time.
So any ideas as to whether my method is any thing like valid or useful and like wise my findings?
Bookmarks