Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Night Vision NZ Ammo Direct


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
Like Tree40Likes

Thread: Load Development - Velocity vs Accuracy

  1. #1
    Bos
    Bos is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Blenheim
    Posts
    980

    Load Development - Velocity vs Accuracy

    Something I've been thinking about for a while now, since I started the process with the 6.5 06 and after some effort (and setbacks), Ive got the 143 gr ELD -X at around 2950 fps and grouping at about .4 - .5. Often there'll be 3 shots through almost the same hole and 2 out to the side marginally
    On paper, you'd have to say that this sort of consistent accuracy is all you need right?. I mean its a dead animal out to 500yds plus any day of the week
    So does it matter a rats arse if the velocity has an ES of say 40 fps, even if the target doesnt support what the chrony is saying?

  2. #2
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    24,814
    a wise man once said."many a good load has been ruined by a chronograph"


    let me ask you another question,which will answer your first.
    IF you tested that load on paper and had only guestimated velocity with book data...would you be happy with load????? farkin oath you would be.....
    go back and pull out Matt n Bruce Grants book "the sharpshooter" what was arguably the bible for hunting semi long range in the days before rangefinders and chronicgraphs were common place.....a ES of 40 wasnt so bad back then ......
    kidmac42, Padox, Finnwolf and 1 others like this.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,072
    Greetings Bos,
    Further to what Micky has shared above I also have a question. If you have tested the load out at say 300 yards and there is no vertical stringing then I am with Micky all the way. Chronographs often spit out both extreme spread and standard deviation and these are regarded with great awe by some. Others, myself, Micky and perhaps you regard it interesting but secondary to how the rifle actually shoots. I invite you to join our club.
    Regards Grandpamac.

  4. #4
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    Can I ask what barrel and length you're running in your 06?
    If your not shooting past 500 have you considered going to a 130 like the scirocco or berger?
    I would be frustrated with a 40fps ES because I have issues but it won't be a problem out to 500

    Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk
    r87mm, Tim Dicko and dannyb like this.
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

  5. #5
    Member kidmac42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    central otago
    Posts
    1,208
    I used to have good accurate loads, then I bought a Chrony and it all turned to shit. Seems too much info can just confuse things sometimes.
    I might start again, and leave the Chrony at home from now on.
    Edit; I'm not very smart, so 'kiss' is relevant.
    Edit; edit; I know enough to not confuse smart with clever.
    Cyclops and Micky Duck like this.
    Ya can't park there mate.

  6. #6
    Bos
    Bos is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Blenheim
    Posts
    980
    Quote Originally Posted by grandpamac View Post
    Greetings Bos,
    Further to what Micky has shared above I also have a question. If you have tested the load out at say 300 yards and there is no vertical stringing then I am with Micky all the way. Chronographs often spit out both extreme spread and standard deviation and these are regarded with great awe by some. Others, myself, Micky and perhaps you regard it interesting but secondary to how the rifle actually shoots. I invite you to join our club.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    Invitation wholeheartedly accepted
    Being what is considered "old school", I always test a load out to 400 and even as far out as 960 if I need to. So I know how the group is perfoming on paper which must be the ultimate decider, regardless of what the chronograph says.
    Technology is great but confidence in repeated bullet placement is what counts

  7. #7
    Bos
    Bos is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Blenheim
    Posts
    980
    Quote Originally Posted by R93 View Post
    Can I ask what barrel and length you're running in your 06?
    If your not shooting past 500 have you considered going to a 130 like the scirocco or berger?
    I would be frustrated with a 40fps ES because I have issues but it won't be a problem out to 500

    Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk
    Hardy Carbon wrap 24 inch. I hear what you're saying but sometimes ridge to ridge shots are whats needed, so whether thats 400 or 600, I'll still have a go. Those 143 Gr ELD-X's seem to be prtty brutal
    R93 likes this.

  8. #8
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos View Post
    Hardy Carbon wrap 24 inch. I hear what you're saying but sometimes ridge to ridge shots are whats needed, so whether thats 400 or 600, I'll still have a go. Those 143 Gr ELD-X's seem to be prtty brutal
    What powder?

    Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

  9. #9
    Bos
    Bos is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Blenheim
    Posts
    980
    Quote Originally Posted by R93 View Post
    What powder?

    Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
    Re 22 (55Gr)
    R93 likes this.

  10. #10
    R93
    R93 is offline
    Member R93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Westland NZ
    Posts
    16,102
    Quote Originally Posted by Bos View Post
    Re 22 (55Gr)
    I had a 26" and loaded for a mate with a 24" in 6.5-06
    His 24" was as fast as my barrel with same load. N560 worked for us if you get a chance to try it. That is if you haven't already.
    I miss my 06.

    Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
    chainsaw likes this.
    Do what ya want! Ya will anyway.

  11. #11
    Member chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Norf
    Posts
    5,773
    Check your spread/grouping at 500 or 600 yards. If it’s 3-5 inch then you can forget the ES out of your chrony, and go hunting. I’ve been running RL25 in my 6506ai and getting 2930 fps with RP brass, ES <10. And 2980 fps with Norma brass but ES is up around 30-40. I settled on the RP and slightly slower speed
    R93 and Bos like this.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Manuwatu
    Posts
    733
    What kind of chronograph? If in doubt try some long range target shooting and look at the vertical spread. I have had good results with the 143 eldx in my 260. Im the same as R93 i dont think my OCD would handle that extreme spread, but for some applications it would be more than acceptable.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    214
    Out to 500m, a 40fps spread could mean max of 1.5" out = dead deer.
    Out to 800m, a 40fps spread could mean max of 4" out = wounded deer.
    Out to 1000m, a 40fps spread could mean max of 9" out = miss.

    If you ever shoot that far
    If you ever shoot deer that far
    If YES, nothing beats holes in paper to confirm...
    R93, zimmer, Moa Hunter and 3 others like this.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Manuwatu
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by JaSa View Post
    Out to 500m, a 40fps spread could mean max of 1.5" out = dead deer.
    Out to 800m, a 40fps spread could mean max of 4" out = wounded deer.
    Out to 1000m, a 40fps spread could mean max of 9" out = miss.

    If you ever shoot that far
    If you ever shoot deer that far
    If YES, nothing beats holes in paper to confirm...
    But then you need to add in the accuracy of the rifle so .4Moa-.5Moa @ 500yards plus muzzle velocity variation. still probably a dead dear.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Manuwatu
    Posts
    733
    deer not dear thats some poor spelling

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Load development in the SI
    By Strider B in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-09-2020, 09:31 AM
  2. 300 Wsm Load development
    By mcche171 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 23-05-2019, 03:22 PM
  3. tikka 7mm Rem Mag load development
    By Strider in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 14-07-2018, 09:52 PM
  4. .308 subsonic load development.
    By Manu in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 16-09-2017, 02:29 PM
  5. Load development
    By Cartman in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-07-2015, 10:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!