Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Night Vision NZ Ammo Direct


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24
Like Tree40Likes

Thread: Load Development - Velocity vs Accuracy

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    375
    If first shot always goes to point of aim and second shot very close everytime then no problem. You aren't shooting groups into animals! Second shot needs to be close as to make a hit if you stuff up the first. Chances are animal may have moved or you will be rushing before it does so you'll not be as settle as first shot anyway. If on the the other hand you are shooting long distance targets or gongs then you will probably need to address the velocity (+600yds)
    So decide if you're going to be shooting deer etc or shooting groups into them. To be honest I cant see anything standing still long enough for you to do that
    Micky Duck likes this.

  2. #17
    Member zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    4,986
    I've had factory ammo (on the very very rare occassion when I have bought some) give an ES of 27 fps.
    One of my goals with handloading is to exceed the performance of factory ammo. A 40 fps ES would mean I should give handloading away. (No, I don't handload/reload to save money.)

    And I'm still trying to come to grips with how a (good) chronograph once used, then going fwd destroys groups?? If the group is detroyed it is something the operator is doing.

    I have had access to chronographs (and of course in the later years owned my own) since 1967. The one in 1967 was possibly the only one in NZ at the time. It was developed by an NZ uni professor and was nothing like we so easily use nowadays.

    The chronograph is just a tool and a safety one at that, which gives you relativity against manufacturers loading charts. It has no hidden mystique, inane evil intelligence. And of course it indicates the quality of your handloading by providing numbers from which ES can be derived. It doesn't create excessive ES, or bad groups, that's up to the handloader/shooter.
    Last edited by zimmer; 06-02-2021 at 09:12 AM.

  3. #18
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    24,657
    well OK then I will answer that there question Mr Zimmer

    Joe Bloggs has a load...lets just for arguments sake say 24.5grns of AR2206 behind a 52grn projectile in mixed brass for his .223
    Joe has been using this same combination for 20 years and rifle will consistantly put all projectiles into ragged wee group somewhere between 1/2 and 1" all day everyday....animals fall over dead and Joe is happy....UNTILL Joes mate....Blowie buys a chronograph and they test Joes load and find its only going 2900fps which just isnt good enough so Joe pokes more powder in to get projectiles going 3100fps.....
    see Joe WAS happy as pig in shit with what he had..... now he has mind game going on,is new load better??? is old load better??? do I need to tweak seating depth??? shit I may need a faster twist barrel to use heavy projectiles...1:8 or 1:7????? this old mini mauser wont handle that ,maybe I need to buy a new rifle????

    Joe was much happier just shooting shit.
    the group wasnt destroyed....Joes happiness with a perfectly good load was.
    title of thread...accuracy Vs velocity.....take away the velocity bit by removing chronicgraph and its a non issue.
    and 4" difference at 500 yards ISNT a wounded deer if aiming for high shoulder......its a lower chest/shoulder hit=dead deer.
    Phil_H likes this.

  4. #19
    Member zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    4,986
    Quote Originally Posted by Micky Duck View Post
    well OK then I will answer that there question Mr Zimmer

    Joe Bloggs has a load...lets just for arguments sake say 24.5grns of AR2206 behind a 52grn projectile in mixed brass for his .223
    Joe has been using this same combination for 20 years and rifle will consistantly put all projectiles into ragged wee group somewhere between 1/2 and 1" all day everyday....animals fall over dead and Joe is happy....UNTILL Joes mate....Blowie buys a chronograph and they test Joes load and find its only going 2900fps which just isnt good enough so Joe pokes more powder in to get projectiles going 3100fps.....
    see Joe WAS happy as pig in shit with what he had..... now he has mind game going on,is new load better??? is old load better??? do I need to tweak seating depth??? shit I may need a faster twist barrel to use heavy projectiles...1:8 or 1:7????? this old mini mauser wont handle that ,maybe I need to buy a new rifle????

    Joe was much happier just shooting shit.
    the group wasnt destroyed....Joes happiness with a perfectly good load was.
    title of thread...accuracy Vs velocity.....take away the velocity bit by removing chronicgraph and its a non issue.
    and 4" difference at 500 yards ISNT a wounded deer if aiming for high shoulder......its a lower chest/shoulder hit=dead deer.
    Ah, MD, first cab off the rank eh...

    You still haven't convinced me how the chronograph is to blame for that. The issue is down to Joe Bloggs not accepting his load for what it is (satisfactory for his purposes) and going off chasing the velocity demon. I have never ever chased velocity over accuracy. That all comes out of the head of Joe Bloggs, not the dumb chronograph.

    I would say further, that I have developed some very accurate (evaluated at only 100 yds though) loads which had high ES. I have stopped further development of that load and gone for different powder/primer combinations.

    Also keep in mind that although the hunting element is predominant in this forum, it is still a hunting and shooting forum and for many of us we are unfortunately no longer able to enjoy hunting. So shooting becomes our pastime. A satisfactory hunting load has more leeway (except for extreme long range hunting) than a load for say a PRS shooter that he may be happy with or a fullbore shooter etc. Horses for courses.

  5. #20
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    24,657
    agree....and Im a bush hobbit who just doest shoot past 350 so the horse doesnt even come into my paddock.......
    zimmer likes this.

  6. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,046
    Greetings All,
    We have now drifted into the world of Psychology. Bos is likely wondering what he started. There is no doubt that we all are effected by how we think about things and have to make our own peace with the world as we see it. We also need to keep our aim on the goal of sufficient accuracy for our purposes. A quote I remember from a pistol bulls eye shooter, whose name I have forgotten, seems appropriate.

    "If you think that it helps then it does"

    Regards Grandpamac.
    Micky Duck likes this.

  7. #22
    dog chaser distant stalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Chch
    Posts
    2,013
    I use n560 in 6.5-06, what chrony are you using? Are you confident in its readings? Can't really beat a piece of paper at range to confirm drop and group size (if weather will let you) 5 rounds on a target at ~500 sou d like would be a good investment

  8. #23
    Bos
    Bos is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Blenheim
    Posts
    973
    Well, GPM
    Yes. Bos is thinking he's opened a can of worms here, for sure
    But what you say is quite right. The morals, do's /dont's, yes's and no's we apply to our hunting and shooting is just an extension of how we are as people and this is the psychology you're referring to.
    Reloading is an interesting pastime; some are anal about every little thing, some are not. Most of us fall somewhere in between, depending on the day, which is just fine.
    And as far as the topic of this post is concerned; accuracy is probably a greater attribute than speed 90 per cent of the time - thats why we have dial-up scopes isn't it??
    Micky Duck likes this.

  9. #24
    Bos
    Bos is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Blenheim
    Posts
    973
    Quote Originally Posted by distant stalker View Post
    I use n560 in 6.5-06, what chrony are you using? Are you confident in its readings? Can't really beat a piece of paper at range to confirm drop and group size (if weather will let you) 5 rounds on a target at ~500 sou d like would be a good investment
    Pro chrono

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Load development in the SI
    By Strider B in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-09-2020, 09:31 AM
  2. 300 Wsm Load development
    By mcche171 in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 23-05-2019, 03:22 PM
  3. tikka 7mm Rem Mag load development
    By Strider in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 14-07-2018, 09:52 PM
  4. .308 subsonic load development.
    By Manu in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 16-09-2017, 02:29 PM
  5. Load development
    By Cartman in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-07-2015, 10:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!